Libby v Rosen - Cheney v Hillary: A Disturbing Contrast in Power
Hillary and Bill Clinton have amassed more power since departing the White House than those who currently occupy that house. Their the power to direct and manipulate Bush Justice Department prosecutors, federal indictments, trials, federal judges, and the media has now been shown to be vastly greater than the Bush/Rove/Cheney incumbents combined. Their glaring power disparity has been showcased by the two of the most important political trials of the new millenium.
The Bush/Cheney impotence in controlling the Libby perjury trial in DC to hide their role in Libby’s non-criminal “outing” of CIA operative Valerie Plame was in stark contrast to the slick power that Hillary/Bill Clinton wielded behind the scenes in manipulating the entire federal judicial/ media apparatus to produce the “show” trial of Hillary’s campaign finance director, David Rosen, in 2005.
Drawing on their wealth of White House experience in deflecting the multitude of scandals and investigations that were emblematic of their “reign” in Washington, the Clintons triangulated the indictment of a fall guy to provide cover for their gross misconduct carried out in plain view of the DNC hierarchy and A-list Hollywood supporters that became witnesses. Because the Clintons co-operated in the “surgical” investigation of their fundraising director’s persecution for actions they directed, they were portrayed by prosecutors as innocent bystanders in the first ever prosecution of a Senator’s finance director for mulrtiple counts of election law fraud.
David Rosen was secretly indicted in 2003, by Public Integrity Chief Noel Hillman, after an investigation lasting two years and the “turning” of Ted Kennedy’s brother in law as an informant who was wired to obtain incriminating admissions from Hillary Clinton’s finance director. The indictment remained conveniently sealed until Messrs Ashcroft and Chertoff had conveniently left the Justice Department by January, 2005.
Rosen faced 15 years in prison for the crime of lying to his boss, Hillary treasurer Andrew Grossman, and thereby causing three false FEC reports to be filed that hid more than $800,000 contributed by Peter Paul to Hillary’s Senate campaign. Presiding Los Angeles Federal Judge Matz, conveniently appointed by the Clintons, and the Justice Department prosecutors flown to L.A. who were directed by Clinton protector Noel Hillman as Chief of the Justcie Dept’s Office of Public Integrity, announced at the outset that Hillary Clinton had nothing whatsoever to do with her employee, Rosen’s actions in directing her largest contributor, Peter Paul, on making his $1.2 million plus “in kind” contributions through her largest fundraising event and then coercing him to make an illegal contribution to the New York state fusion party, Working Family Pary, on Hillary’s behalf.
No media showed up for the trial except for the occasional visit by a NY Sun Reporter. Even the Los Angeles Times, whose offices were a few blocks from the court house, failed to send a reporter during the two week trial. As a result, no Washington style scrutiny was applied to the numerous contradictory testimonies by various Friends of Bill and Hillary. Grammy’s producer Gary Smith and Clinton intimate James Levin flatly refuted each other’s testimony with no reaction whatsoever from the Justice Department. This would normally be called perjury, but in Hillary’s world perjury is a concept that never applies to her reality.
Even a smoking gun tape of Rosen’s admissions made to Teddy Kennedy’s wired brother-in-law was omitted from the courtroom at the last minute after the prosecution stunned the judge and teh courtroom by disparaging their own tape and refusing to present it! A partial transcript of the tape was obtained by the New Orleans Times Picayune (because Kennedy’s brother in law Ray Reggie was a big time player there) and no other major media outlet picked up the stunning disclosures by Rosen that he was a “guinea pig” for the White House’s strategy in defending his charges and that Bill Clinton asked for the number of a Democrat contributor who provided prostitutes for DNC officials at the DNC convention, so Bill could “party with him the day after he left the White House”!
Compare the two trials, and you will see who wields the power in Washington today- even before Hilland Bill usurp the White House in 2008 by hook or by crook. Read the Rosen trial transcript and weep over the future of our republic in the hands of America’s female political counterpart to Attilla the Hun.
Thursday ~ February 02, 2007 by Intermeddler Posted in Uncategorized|
