Media Protects Hillary’s Role in Bill Clinton’s Civil Fraud Case in Los Angeles
As the Tony Rezko trial begins in Chicago, Clinton and her surrogates are linking Obama to Rezko and the media is speculating about whether Obama will be called to testify as a witness in the case. Obama has always admitted he received $85,000 in contributions from Rezko which Obama has now donated to charity rather than keep. Yet the civil fraud trial of Bill Clinton for defrauduing Hillary’s largest donor in 2000 into giving her campaign more than $1.2 million, pending in Los Angeles courts since 2003, is now preparing for a November, 2008 trial. The discovery that is now proceeding after a February 21 hearing, and the pending trial, have NEVER been announced by the mainstream media. Hillary was able to extricate herself as a co-defendant in the case in January, 2008 after years of appeals to be protected by the First Amendment from tort claims arising out of federal campaign solicitations she made. Her abuse of the intent of California’s anti-SLAPP law after the California Supreme Court refused to dismiss her from the case in 2004 is emblematic of her contempt for the Rule of Law. Hillary will be called as a witness in both discovery and the trial according to the trial court Judge who so-advised Hillary’s attorney David Kendall when he dismissed Hillary as a co-defendant in 2007. A subpoena is being prepared this month and will be served personally on Hillary, along with Chelsea, Pa Gov. Ed Rendell, Al Gore and other well known political and media figures. Yet the media has refused to report about this landmark civil fraud case- brought by Hillary’s biggest 2000 donor to her Senate race, regarding allegations that were corroborated by the Department of Justice in the criminal trial of Hillary’s finance director David Rosen in May, 2005. That indictment and trial was credited as resulting from the civil suit’s allegations by Peter Paul, the Hollywood dot com millionaire Bill Clinton convinced to donate more than $1.2 million (according to the DOJ prosecutors and the FBI) to Hillary’s Senate campaign as part of a post White House business deal with Bill. The media - except for World Net Daily- has also suspiciously refused to report on Hillary’s last FEC report regarding her 2000 Senate campaign, filed in January 30, 2006. In a secret settlement of an FEC complaint by the plaintiff in Paul v Clinton, Peter Paul, the FEC fined Hillary’s campaign $35,000 for hiding more than $720,000 in donations from Paul, and it required Hillary’s campaign to file a 4th amended FEC report. In that report Hillary and her campaign again hid Paul’s $1.2 million contribution to her campaign and falsely attributed $250,000 as being donated by Paul’s partner, Spider Man creator Stan Lee, who swore in a video taped deposition he never gave Hillary or her campaign any money. Lee did testify to trading $100,000 checks with Paul to make it appear he gave $100,000 to Hillary’s campaign (admission of a felony) but none of that has been reported by the “overly critical” media! Where is the outrage from Obama that the press is engaging in a double standard relating to his possible role in the Rezko trial and his refunding the $85,000 contributed to his campaign by Rezko- which Obama has always admitted taking. The media makes no mention of Hillary’s role as a witness in Bill’s fraud trial for defrauding Hillary’s largest donor- and Hillary’s refusal to refund the $1.2 million she illegally received from Paul, which she has denied taking from Paul ever since the Washington Post asked her about Paul and his felony convictions from the 1970’s before her first Senate election in 2000?
Hillary and Bill Clinton have made a significant issue about how the press is treating Hillary unfairly in their hyper-critical reporting on her and their “softball” reporting on Barak Obama. Hillary maintains she has been fully investigated by the media and Barak hasn’t!
Wednesday ~ March 03, 2008 by Intermeddler Posted in "Ed Rendell", "Norman Hsu", "hillary uncensored", Barack, Chelsea Clinton, DNC, Hillary, Rezko, bill clinton, cheney, democrats, election, entertainment, george bush, hollywood, lewis libby, nbc, obama, peter paul, politics, scooter libby, stan lee, tony rezko, washington|
“Comments”
SEN. CLINTON YOU SHOULD BE ASHAME OF YOURSELF. HOW DARE YOU SPEAK SO HARSH TO SEN. OBAMA WHEN YOU HAVE A LOT OF EXPLAINING TO DO.
SEN. CLINTON, HOW DARE YOU. YOU SHOULD BE ASHAME OF YOURSELF. YOU STOOD IN FRONT OF THOUSANDS SPEAKING SO ILL MANNER OF SEN. OBAMA WHEN IN FACT YOU HAVE A LOT OF EXPLAINING TO DO.
Hillary Clinton Unmasked…She is a
Slanghter…Liar…Evil…Twisted…Bully…Dirty with Scandal…
The real Hillary Clinton stood up at the Democratic presidential debate this week: angry, sarcastic, stubborn, secretive, arrogant, mired in the past, victim of the media, and still firmly convinced that she is uniquely entitled to the Democratic Party nomination and the presidency.
That Hillary hasn’t really been on display much since the debacle of her disastrous health care plan and the end of Bill Clinton’s impeachment trial, when she haughtily flaunted her combative personality.
But make no mistake about it — that’s the Hillary Clinton that we’ll see if she somehow manages to steal the Democratic nomination.
She’s found her voice. The one that so alienated everyone she came into contact with over her health care plan that her own party destroyed it. The one that publicly and loudly defended Bill and arranged for attacks on Monica Lewinsky when she knew the complete and sordid truth.
She’s always had a chip on her shoulder and a strange paranoia, but it’s definitely gotten worse. Now it’s not just the vast right wing conspiracy that is out to get her. Now it’s the mainstream media. How are they doing that? By asking her the first questions at the debates!
Hillary’s snide comment about whether Barack needed a pillow to be made more comfortable was downright embarrassing. The anticipated applause line on her script never happened. The audience was silent. The press was amazed. And Barack seemed genuinely startled by her nuttiness — he looked over at her as if he was viewing a dotty old aunt at a family dinner, the one that everyone politely humors.
Her lifelong pattern of secrecy was once again evident. While publicly promoting transparency in government, she steadfastly refuses to release her personal income tax returns. That’s a clear tip-off that there’s something to hide. Recall that the Clintons selectively released tax returns in Arkansas, but refused to go back to 1980, when Hillary had her windfall in cattle futures.
During the debate, Hillary suggested that she’d release the returns “soon,” but her staff quickly backtracked. She implied that she’s been too busy to deal with releasing the returns. Does she really think anyone believes that it will take more than simply making a copy of the return? She’s stalling and there’s a reason for that.
Most likely, the return will show how much Bill has been making from his partnership with the Sheik of Dubai and his other business ventures. Should the spouse of a presidential candidate be in business with a foreign leader who needs favors from the U.S. government? Definitely not. That’s why we’ll never see those returns.
And then there are the Clinton Library records that document her schedule as first lady. She doesn’t want them released either because they will definitively show that she was never the co-president. The Library has been stalling on the release of those documents for years. During the debate, she said that she wanted them released as quickly as possible and seemed to blame the Bush administration for the delay. But today, the White House indicated that she had made no requests for any expedited release.
The old Hillary, the real Hillary, is back.
And there’s apparently been no one to stop her from acting on her own worse instincts.
Underneath the veneer of the practiced smile and the strategically used giggle, there is a rage that is always close to the surface. It was on display in the debate.
Hillary Clinton is furious that America has not agreed to her coronation. She doesn’t understand why voters are rejecting her and embracing Barack Obama. She just doesn’t get it.
Never one to engage in self reflection, she can’t blame herself or even her incompetent strategists and advisers. They’re too close to her. She can’t accept the sorry fact that her campaign has been a disaster because it was based on the past and not the future, because it was premised on her phony experience and maintaining the status quo, and because her negative outlook is completely out of step with the mood of America. And finally, because in the positive message of Barack Obama, Americans see a stark contrast with her doom and gloom view of the world.
Has Peter Paul ever contacted the media? Why aren’t they covering this? What is going on!
SOME OF US DO NOT HEAR ABOUT THIS CASE MUCH AT ALL.
WHY IS NOT BEING TALKED ABOUT MUCH IN THE MEDIA OR PAPERS.
THIS SHOULD BE OUT THERE IT IS NOT FAIR THAT ANY MINIMAL ISSUE BY SOMEONE ELSE GETS BLOWN UP BY MANY THINGS THAT CONCERNE THE CLINTON GET SWEPT UNDER THE RUG OR THEY GET A PASS.
SOMEONE HAS TO STAND UP TO THE MEAT GRINDING CLINTON MACHINE BEFORE IS TO LATE.
THEY HAVE TO BE RE-EXPOSED
Another one bites the dust.
Mr. Paul and his wife had no problem supporting the Clinton’s inspite of their actions and behavior towards the law and others and decided to do business with them. Mr. Paul must feel that it’s okay for them to defraud the American people and not adhere to the rule of law as long as they don’t take him down. Does Mr. Paul refuse to see how ugly the dems have become and how it is not what is good for others but what is good for their own personal agenda and power trip? He finds himself in the not so rare group of associates, advisors, and “friends, who have been screwed by the Clintons and the Dems. Mr. Paul became friends with them anyway. That doesn’t show empathy for all the people who have been screwed before it became personal to him.
Another one bites the dust.
Look in a dictionary…
The Clintons : The most corrupted people in politics. Dirtiest people in america. Liars.
WE NEED TO GET THIS OUT THERE, THE MEDIA IS BEING UNFAIR!!! THEY WANTED PROOF, WELL NOW THERE IS PROOF , SO WHAT ARE THEY WAITING FOR!!! WHY ARE THESE POLITICS GET IT THEIR WAY! IF I LIED TO A JUDGE I WOULD BE SENT STRAIGHT TO JAIL, AND THESE PEOPLE JUST GET AWAY WITH IT!!! SHE CANNOT BE TRUSTED AS A PRESIDENT!!! WE NEED TO LOOK FOR A PLAN TO GET THIS OUT THERE!!! I’M DOING WHAT I CAN ON THE INTERNET, BUT WE ALSO NEED TO HAVE PEOPLE OUT THERE TO GET THE MEDIA’S ATTENTION!! THIS IS SERIOUS. MAYBE HAVE SIGNS ON THE MORNING NEW’S WINDOW. KEEP CALLING THE MEDIA! OR MAYBE RUN NAKED WITH A SIGN AT A GAME WITH A SIGN WITH HILLCAP.ORG ON IT OR SOMETHING. OK SO THAT WAS A LITTLE TOO MUCH, BUT WE HAVE TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT. LET THE TRUTH BE TOLD!!
I am outraged. But I need some way to document the court setting the trial date. I found exactly one mainstream news article(LA Times, I think) on the case. Need verifiable details (how I happened to get here just now). What court, case or docket (?) number, who to call to verify (the attorney?).
Have you tried writing a Press Release and sending to newspapers across the country? Good time to issue a press release in PA newspapers.
Mr. Paul you need to speak out in public. Do not wait on the media.
