Hillary’s Peter Paul Case Trumps Obama’s Wright & Rezko Combined
THE DOCUMENTS DON’T LIE…
The Public Record of Peter Paul’s Case Against Hillary Clinton Shows a Massive Corruption of The Government and the Media Enabling The Serial Frauds and Illegalities that Won Hillary’s Senate Seat and Obstructed Her Accountability- Enabling Her Race for the White House
PaulvClinton.com links all the original court pleadings and government documents, letters, published articles and photos associated with the landmark civil fraud suit Paul v Clinton et al that has now begun discovery for a trial in early 2009. It provides independent and irrefutable evidence of the frauds directed by the Clintons against not only Peter Paul, but also against the voters of New York, Hillary Clinton’s 2000 Senate opponent, the Federal Election Commission, the IRS, the FBI, the Justice Department Office of Public Integrity, the U.S. Senate, the Inspector General, Federal Courts, Grand Juries, and the shareholders of Stan Lee Media.
The sole object of these frauds and serial illegalities were to assure the election and then re-election of Hillary Clinton to the Senate and to thwart and obstruct all investigations into those frauds to protect Hillary and Bill Clinton from accountability to the law and to advance their ambitions to regain the White House.
The evidence from sworn testimony in court transcripts, FBI declarations, FEC General Counsel reports and investigations, Washington Post stories and original letters, photos and videos present irrefutable proof of a collusion between a sitting U.S. President, a First Lady turned U.S. Senator, and then Chairman of the Democratic Party Ed Rendell to defraud a Hollywood businessman of $2 million and destroy him and his public company in order to generate the largest campaign contribution, made at a President’s request for a quid pro quo, to benefit the Senate candidate.
Thereafter corruption by the Clintons of every branch of government that investigated their collusion covered up the illegalities involved and enabled them to avoid accountability from the public and all regulatory and investigatory federal agencies and the federal judiciary. The evidence presented clearly supports the reasonable conclusion that the Clintons have succeeded in exempting themselves from the Rule of Law in the United States and from meaningful scrutiny and exposure by the media at large.
These recent documents and the statements by the Department of Justice Office of Public Integrity Prosecutor explain it all:
Federal Election Commission Complaint - December 31, 2007
Peter Paul asks the FEC to void its previous conciliation agreement granting immunity to Hillary Clinton and New York Senate 2000, and to investigate illegal solicitation and coordination of illegal campaign contributions and ongoing violations of reporting laws by Sen. Clinton and her agents.
Declaration Against Hillary Clinton By Peter Paul March, 2007
Responsive Declaration by Hillary R Clinton, April, 2007
Statement of Hillary Clinton’s Illegalities to California Appellate Court- They find she might have committed them!
See also the Closing Statement to the Jury by Department of Justice Office of Public Integrity prosecutor Dan Schwager in the 2005 trial of Clinton campaign finance director David Rosen. Schwager said that the crime being prosecuted by the government was denying the public’s right to know about Peter Paul’s $1.2 million contribution to Hillary’s campaign, and continued efforts to obstruct that right by filing three false FEC reports - felony charges for which Rosen faced 15 years in jail. Nevertheless, the Federal Election Commission subsequently allowed Hillary and her campaign to file a fourth false report, which the FEC used as a basis to settle all previous violations and immunize the defendants from further investigation.
Hillary Clinton Denies Paul Gave Any Money to Washington Post query, and Vows Not To Take Any 3 Days After Paul’s $1.2 Million Fundraiser For Hillary
Hillary Clinton Letter to Peter Paul “with gratitude for his friendship” dated a day after second Washington Post article denying his contribution
Filed under: "Ed Rendell", "Norman Hsu", "hillary uncensored", Al Gore, Barack, DNC, Hillary, Rezko, bill clinton, election, entertainment, hollywood, judge munoz, lewis libby, obama, peter paul, politics, race, tony rezko, washington
Mr. Paul,
The medida needs to particpate in getting the word out more on Se. Hillary Clinton.
This needs to be put on CNN, FOX, MSNBC. Everyone needs to know about this!
Since you don’t seem to list your contact info I’ll just tell you here, where you likely won’t see it.
Even without listening to Rush, I can look at the call you quoted and see he’s making fun of Hilary. He said she didn’t know about it, then proceeded to say how she never knew about any wrong doings, pointing out how such a ’smart woman’ never knows the crimes she and her mod family commits. Go get Rush’s “I don’t remember” parody song about her.
Sean might be an idiot, but Rush knows full well what kind of person Clinton is. Stop taking the guy so seriously, he clowns around on his show.
Now go re-read that call without your ’serious business’ glasses on, and you’ll see he wasn’t defending her, he was making fun of her constantly used ‘I don’t know” defense.
You aren’t a whistleblower. She owes you a million bucks, and you are taking it out of her hide. You organized and carried out the fundraiser, take responsibility too.
How can this info be circulated to the voters. All need to be cognizant of this fraud issue and trial?