Peter Paul

Hillary’s Perjury & Obstructions of Justice In Castle Grande Scandal Revealed in Prosecutor Dash Archives

In the first ever look at the legal memos prepared by Special Counsels Ken Starr and Robert Ray’s office detailing the evidence assembled of Hilary Clinton’s deceptions to Special prosecutor investigators and the grand juries she testified before relating to White Water, the Rose Law Firm frauds and bribing of Hillary’s former partner Hubbel, a pattern of deception and obfuscation in sworn testimony and declarations by Hillary R Clinton emerges that is identical to Hillary Clinton’s latest perjuries and obstructions in the Paul v Clinton case.

Jerry Seper in the Washington Times published an exclusive peek into secret memos from Ken Starr’s “ethics” counsel, Sam Dash, which were sealed with all of the impeachment files. They have now been identified among Dash’s papers which were bequeathed to the Library of Congress in 2004 by Dash’s estate. Seper introduced these revealing documents, which describe the abundance of the evidence that Special Prosecutors assembled to indict the First Lady for Perjury and Obstruction of Justice:

 ”A decade before Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton admitted fudging the truth during the presidential campaign, federal prosecutors quietly assembled hundreds of pages of evidence suggesting she concealed information and misled a federal grand jury about her work for a failing Arkansas savings and loan at the heart of the Whitewater probe, according to once-secret documents that detail the internal debates over whether she should have faced criminal charges.

Ordinarily, such files containing grand jury evidence and prosecutors’ deliberations are never made public. But the estate of Sam Dash, a lifelong Democrat who served as the ethics adviser to Whitewater Independent Counsel Kenneth W. Starr, donated his documents from the infamous 1990s investigation to the Library of Congress after his 2004 death, unwittingly injecting into the public domain much of the testimony and evidence gathered against Mrs. Clinton from former law partners, White House aides and other witnesses.

The documents, reviewed by The Washington Times, identify numerous instances in which prosecutors questioned Mrs. Clinton’s honesty, an issue that continues to dog her on the campaign trail after she was forced to acknowledge earlier this year exaggerating a story about coming under sniper fire as first lady during a visit to Bosnia in 1996.”

 These documents evidence a pattern of conduct that was repeated in Hillary’s dealing with the “Galagate” scandal detailed in Paul v Clinton. Here again Hillary denied any knowledge of Peter Paul’s , or personal involvement with, the role and contributions Paul made to her campaign.

Starting a few days after the August, 2000 $1.2 million Gala Paul underwrote continuing through today she has been “enabled” to deny her videotaped involvement in and accountability for the illegalities connected with her fundraising. What the Department of Justice described as a felony when her finance director did it, didnt apply to Hillary’s identical conduct notwithstanding videotapes capturing her in flagrante delecti of felony violations of the federal election law !.

The evidence of her personal involvement in the illegal solicitation and coordination of Paul’s expenditures for her campaign, like the Rose Law Firm billing records, was hidden- this time by the US Atty in NY, from 2001 when it was subpoenaed until April, 2007 when it was wrested from the US Attorney’s files. Lack of this evidence enabled the FEC and Judge in the Rosen case to exonerate her for “lack of any evidence”.

Most exasperating is that the DOJ Prosecutor who participated in convicting Lewis Libby, Dan Schwaber- told the jury in the Rosen case, May, 2005  that the crime being prosecuted against Rosen was “Denying the Public’s right to know Peter Paul personally gave more than $1.2 million to Hillary’s national campaign” (See Trial Transcript, PDF pages 52,55,75)

Yet Hillary has denied the public that right by lying to the Washington Post in two articles from August, 2000 and then causing a 4th false FEC report to be filed on January 30, 2006, which not only omitted any reference to a $1.2 million contribution from Peter Paul- but it falsely reported that Paul’s 2 holding companies, Excelsior and Paraversal, were paid $839,000 for Event 39 and that Stan Lee personally gave $225,000 even though he testified under oath on video tape that he gave no money at all and had “traded” $100,000 checks with Paul to make it appear he contributed to Hillary’s campaign!

So you have Hillary telling the Post in August, 2000 that Peter Paul gave no money at all for Event 39 (The Gala), and you have an admission by Hillary through Howard Wolfson that the event cost over “$1 million and was an “in kind” contribution”.

In May, 2005 Rosen was tried for hiding the true $1.2 million cost of the Gala, causing Hillary’s campaign to falsely report in October, 2000, January 2001 and July, 2001, that Event 39 cost $377,000- $400,000.

In October, 2005 Hillary’s Treasurer Grossman admits he “hid” more than $700,000 contributed to Event 39 in three false FEC reports and he is fined (not indicted like Rosen was).

In January, 2006 Hillary and Grossman file a fourth FEC report that omits what the DOJ said was a fact the public deserved to know- that Peter Paul personally contributed $1.2 million- and it omits that Peter Paul gave $1 to her campaign- it omits that Event 39 was an in kind contribution costing more than $1.2 million.

Hillary’s Castle Grande obstructions are repeated- this time on the public record, in plain sight, aided and abetted by the DOJ Office of Public Integrity- which created a Soviet style show trial of Hillary’s finance director for hiding the $1.2 million cost of a fundraiser that Hillary was quoted through Wolfson by the Washington Post as knowing cost “more than $1 million”; the Federal Judge in the Rosen trial who stated “Hillary had nothing whatsoever to do with the Gala and the Jury was so instructed”; and finally the FEC itself which enabled Hillary’s campaign to file a 4th amended report on  Event 39 6 months after the Rosen trial which omitted any reference at all to Peter Paul.

Thursday ~ May 05, 2008 by Intermeddler Posted in "Ed Rendell", "hillary uncensored", Barack, DNC, Hillary, bill clinton, democrats, election, entertainment, hillary clinton, peter paul, politics, washington|