Peter Paul

Latest Posts

Search

Is Hillary Helping To Hide Felon Fundraiser Friend Jim Levin From Bill Clinton Fraud Trial?

Clinton Family Friend and Fundraiser Jim Levin Confers With The Clintons About Peter Paul At $1.2 million Hollywood Gala Fundraiser For Hillary Paid For By Paul

Paul v Clinton et al, the California civil fraud suit pending against Bill Clinton (and Grammys producer Gary Smith) brought by the Hollywood dot com millionaire who Bill enlisted as Hillary’s top 2000 donor and then defrauded and destroyed his public company, will be set for trial as soon as co-defendant and Clinton intimate Jim Levin is served a new Summons and complaint.

(See You Tube that explains the story)

Jim Levin was a key government witness against his former mentor and friend, Hillary Clinton national finance director David Rosen, in a criminal election law fraud trial in Los Angeles in May, 2005. Rosen was indicted by the Justice Department for hiding the $1.2 million plus cost of the Hillary fundraising Gala, paid for by Paul personally, from Hillary’s campaign, causing Hillary to file 3 false FEC reports.

Levin was convicted in December of 2006 of various frauds on Chicago schools and was sentenced to probation because of his cooperation with the government as a witness in the Rosen trial and alleged other cooperation he is still engaging in.

Levin has been evading service of the Summons in the Paul v Clinton case since 2004. Now that the California court ruled on February 21 that a trial date for Bill Clinton will be set as soon as Levin is served with his copy of the complaint, the race is on to find Levin.

A member of Paul’s legal team attempted to enlist the aid of the US Probation Office in Chicago to assure that Levin could not obstruct justice while on probation by evading service of a lawful summons. It is the duty of every convicted felon on probation to faithfully comply with all laws and regulations.

Since it is the duty of the Probation Office to monitor the actions of probationers to ensure they comply with the law- it is surprising when the Probation Office advises an officer of the Court that they will not intercede to require their probationer to desist from obstructing a court process by hiding his location.

When it comes to those who the Clintons have a reason to protect for their own well being, they have a facility to turn the judicial system on its head.

Rosen’s case was tried before a Clinton appointed Federal Judge Matz. Matz abused his ethical requirements for judicial impartiality when he began the trial by declaring to the jury and the media that Hillary had no involvement whatsoever in the illegal fundraising charges. ( A statement contradicted by a video tape of Hillary talking to underwriter Paul the day he began paying for the event). The judge also said that the government’s key witness, Peter Paul, was a con man. the judge knew that Rosen’s defense was going to be that he was conned by Paul who hid the price of the gala from him.

Judge Matz’ prejudicial remarks to the jury about the key witness that the Defendant Rosen built his case on discrediting, the ensured the jury could not possibly convict Rosen beyond a reasonable doubt. This egregious violation of ethics by the Judge - knowingly throwing the trial- was never objected to by the DOJ Prosecutors (the same two who tried the Lewis Libby case), who joined with the Judge in opening remarks to the jury that made it clear Hillary had nothing whatever to do with the case. The trial became a Soviet style show trial with Levin paraded by the government as their star witness.

The reality was that the same Chief of Public Integrity who masterminded the Rosen indictment and trial, Noel Hillman, also masterminded the “non” prosecution of National Security document thief and destroyer Sandy Berger.

Hillman worked closely from 2002-2005 with Paul’s attorneys to completely understand the Clintons’ role in the felony solicitation and coordination of Paul’s $1.2 million plus contributions, and the hiding of that contribution from voters and the FEC. Yet he misrepresented their role in the affair to the jury in the Rosen case to exculpate the Clintons.

Since Mr Hillman was promoted to the lifetime position of Federal Judge in New Jersey before Rep Tom Davis, Chairman of the Govt Reform Cmtee in the House accused him of obstructing the 9-11 Commission investigation, Hillman was never challenged on his actions in obstructing justice in both the Berger and Rosen prosecutions- all apparently designed to protect the Clintons.

Friday ~ March 03, 2008 by Intermeddler Posted in "Ed Rendell", "Norman Hsu", "hillary uncensored", Barack, Chelsea Clinton, DNC, Hillary, Rezko, bill clinton, bush, current affairs, david rosen, democrats, election, entertainment, hollywood, jim levin, obama, peter paul, politics, race, ron paul, stan lee, tony rezko, washington| 1 Comment

New FEC Complaint Details Gov Rendell Complicity in FEC Reporting Frauds By The DNC and Hillary’s Senate Campaign

Then DNC Chair Ed Rendell With Hollywood Donor Peter Paul & Wife At Al Gore Fundraising Gala June 8, 2000- Paul’s Expenditures of $100,000 Never Reported to FEC

Renewed allegations of major campaign finance fraud directed by former DNC Chairman, now PA Governor, Ed Rendell to benefit the DNC and Hillary Clinton’s Senate campaign were detailed in a second FEC complaint filed by DNC and Hillary mega donor Peter Paul the first of the year.

Gov. Rendell denied to the FEC any involvement with Paul after Paul originally filed an FEC complaint in July, 2001 against the Clintons and Hillary’s Senate campaign for failure to report Paul’s personal expenditures exceeding $1.2 million, made at the direct and illegal request of Bill and Hillary Clinton to assure Hillary’s election to the Senate.

After a four year investigation of Paul’s charges, the DOJ indicted and tried Hillary’s finance director, David Rosen, in May, 2005 for hiding Paul’s more than $1.2 million in expenditures from being reported in three false FEC reports filed by Hillary’s campaign, and the FEC forced Hillary’s Senate campaign treasurer Andrew Grossman to take responsibility for knowingly filing the false reports hiding more than $700,000 of Paul’s cash in kind contributions.

Mysteriously, the FEC allowed Hillary and her campaign to enter into a secret settlement of the charges that they knowingly violated the law by making false reports, obtaining immunity from further investigation if they paid a fine of $35,000 and filed a 4th corrected FEC report. When that 4th report was filed on January 30, 2006, it omitted entirely any reference to Paul’s contributions and made it appear as though Paul’s companies were paid $839,000 - while hiding a $75,000 payment to Clinton friend Grammy’s producer Gary Smith.

Because of the frauds involved in the latest FEC filings by Hillary and her campaign, and the use of those new frauds as the basis to end further investigation into the multiple illegalities associated with Hillary and Bill’s efforts to induce and coerce more than $1.6 million in contributions from Paul, Paul has filed a new FEC complaint which demands that the FEC settlement with Hillary and her Campaign be set aside because of the frauds that it was based on, and a renewed investigation be made using new video evidence of Hillary breaking the law released by the US Attorney in NY in April, 2007 - after withholding the direct link between Hillary and Paul’s expenditures from all the previous investigations!

Gov Rendell was the DNC official who directed Paul’s efforts to induce Bill Clinton to work with Paul after he left the White House by advising and negotiating with Paul to become a major donor to the DNC for Al Gore’s campaign, and to become Hillary’s largest donor. When the Washington Post asked Hillary Clinton about her relationship with Paul Rendell cautioned Paul to keep quiet about it and deceive the Post reporter by not contradicting Hillary’s false statements through her spokesman Howard Wolfson, that Paul gave no money to her campaign.

Rendell never caused Paul’s expenditures of more than $100,000 to produce Al Gore’s Hollywood fundraiser for 150 on June 8, 2000 to be reported by the DNC to the FEC, nor the pledge of securities Rendell pried out of Paul of $150,000 to be made to the DNC for Gore in September, 2000, as required by law.

Rendell was intimately involved with all of Paul’s “giving” to the DNC and Hillary’s campaign yet denied any involvement when queried by the FEC General Counsel in September, 2001- violating Title 18 SEc 1001, making or causing false statements to be made to government agencies.

When the FEC reviews the evidence that demands they set aside their settlement agreement with Hillary and her campaign, they should decide to include Ed Rendell as a target for prosecution for a variety of illegalities as Chairman of the DNC in dealing with Paul.