Could the Paul v Clinton Fraud Suit Upset the Clinton Democratic Party?
The landmark civil fraud suit, Paul v Clinton et al pending in Los Angeles Superior Court against the Clintons on and off since 2001 has been hidden from the public by the mainstream media for seven years. While the case was showcased in the documentary trailer for Hillary! Uncensored which made internet history with more than five million downloads in a few weeks in November, 2007, it has remained under the radar of the public consciousness as part of the greatest political scandal cover-up since Watergate. On Thursday, February 21, 2008, a hearing before Judge Munoz will be held in Paul v Clinton with David Kendall representing the Clintons. A trial date will be set for late in 2008 and a discovery schedule will be created for sworn depositions to be taken of all principal witnesses. The limited perception and understanding that exists of the case is that it is simply a business fraud suit by Clinton donor and erstwhile Clinton employer Peter Paul against Bill Clinton who was aided and abetted by Hillary in inducing Paul to spend more than $1.2 million to elect Hillary to the Senate with a false promise to work with paul when Clinton left the White House. Paul and Clinton Review Terms of Employment for Bill’s Post White House Consulting Services August 12, 2000 But the prosecution of the first suit to haul a President and Senator into court for fraud and coercion has the potential of revealing through sworn testimony of the Clinton hierarchy of the Democratic Party the culture of corruption that permeates the party and egregious examples of party leaders including Al Gore, Ed Rendell, Terry McAuliffe as frauds and scofflaws. The threat to the party as well as the Clintons that is posed by the discovery and trial in the suit is that it not only links the Clintons personally to felony violations of the law and obstructions of justice but it will also destroy the credibility of Clinton surrogates who control the party at a time when Obama will be looking to take over the Party with his people. The significance of the lawsuit is that it exposes a broader focus on the Corruption of the Clinton Cabal that has a stranglehold on the Democratic Party. The case represents much more than the frauds that Hillary and Bill directed to win and keep a Senate seat to launch a Presidential campaign from- it has the ability to expose the institutional culture of corruption embraced by the Clinton leadership of the Democratic Party- which is dedicated to assuring the attaining of unaccountable power for the Clintons at the expense of the Rule of Law and respect for the Constitutional processes of government. Witnesses who personally interacted with Paul that will be called to confirm that Paul was illegally expending millions to support Hillary’s campaign solely as a quid pro quo for Bill Clinton’s agreement to serve as a rainmaker for two of his companies for a year as soon as he left the White House. The quid pro quo made between Clinton and Paul subjected Paul’s expenditures to federal maximum limits for his expenditure/in-kind contributions to Hillary’s campaign. The quid pro quo by operation of law made Paul’s donations illegally excessive. Witness/participants include former DNC Chair and Penn. Gov. Ed Rendell- who directed various illegal contributions made by Paul to the DNC and Hillary’s campaign and who failed to report to the FEC Paul’s expenditures of more than $100,000 for a gala for 150 Hollywood people for Al Gore’s campaign and the DNC on June 8, 2000; Terry McAuliffe who counseled Paul in 2 meetings to become a major donor to Hillary to hire Bill; Harold Ickes- who counseled Paul to do what Rendell was suggesting in giving to Hillary’s campaign as a means to hire Bill which facts Ickes hid in his testimony in the Rosen trial, Howard Wolfson- who spoke on behalf of Hillary to the Washington Post about Paul’s in kind contributions of more than $1million to pay for Hillary’s biggest fundraising event. Yet Wolfson has never been interviewed or called as a witness by the DOJ or the FEC to testify to that knowledge either when David Rosen was being indicted and tried for allegedly hiding that same knowledge from Hillary’s campaign. The case that the media refuses to cover will be impossible to ignore when the witnesses from the Clinton Family, DNC leadership, media and Hollywood begin testifying in depositions under oath. Stay tuned to www.hillcap.org
Tuesday ~ February 02, 2008 by Intermeddler Posted in "Ed Rendell", "hillary uncensored", Barack, Chelsea Clinton, DNC, Hillary, Rezko, bill clinton, cbs, cher, current affairs, david geffen, david rosen, democrats, election, entertainment, george bush, hollywood, lewis libby, nbc, obama, peter paul, pimped, politics, ron paul, stan lee, washington| 1 Comment
8 Million Internet Views of Hillary!Uncensored Film Helps Derail Hillary White House Bid!
13 Minute Segment of Hillary! Uncensored Film Ranked By Google As #1 Video in the World in November, 2007 Hillary Clinton’s sinking political fortunes have been linked in part to the viral phenomenon surrounding the unedited 13 minute segment of the first ever documentary on Hillary R Clinton, Hillary ! Uncensored.The documentary presents and documents the illegalities claimed in the landmark civil fraud suit against the Clintons pending in California, Paul v Clinton et al,The 13 minute segment of the 65 minute documentary Hillary! Uncensored- Banned By The Media, has been reviewed by Fox News, the New York Times and the Walter Annenberg Communication Center, among others, because of the unprecedented public interest in a fragment of the first Hillary Clinton documentary ever released.As of May 10, 2008, 180 days after its release on the internet, there was a collective five million views on Google’s Hillary! Uncensored- Banned By the Media and its You Tube alter ego- The Shocking Video Hillary Clinton Doesnt Want You To See along with a Live Leak Media version. Speculation has been fueled by bloggers around the internet that the damning evidence of serial illegality in Hillary’s election to the Senate presented through exclusive home videos of Hillary, letters, photos and court filings from Paul v Clinton et al has had a profound effect on Hillary’s popularity in the polls in the early primaries. Hillary’s refusal to admit that Peter Paul was her biggest 2000 donor, even after Dept of Justice Prosecutors in the criminal trial of Hillary’s finance director David Rosen in 2005 stated that “Paul personally gave more than $1.2 million” to her campaign, has raised the specter of Hillary’s ongoing legal violations. Hillary’s continuing refusal to admit she misstated the facts about soliciting and coordinating Paul’s contributions to her campaign to the voters since her false statements to the Washington Post in August, 2000, includes her filing of another deceptive FEC report on January 30, 2006 that hides Paul’s identity again. The film’s interviews, videos and photos of Hillary- along with her personal letters and sworn declaration dealing with Paul, show that Hillary has done and continues to do what the Rosen DOJ prosecutors described as the basis for putting Rosen in jail for 15 years- denying the public’s right to know of Peter Paul’s $1.2 million contribution to her campaign- the largest donation by a magnitude of 4 of any contribution she reported! Contributions to support the discovery phase of Paul v Clinton et al through the Hillary Clinton Accountability Project are being collected in anticipation of an expensive and lengthy discovery phase commencing June, 2008.
Tuesday ~ February 02, 2008 by Intermeddler Posted in "Ed Rendell", "hillary uncensored", Barack, Chelsea Clinton, DNC, Hillary, Rezko, bill clinton, bush, cbs, current affairs, david rosen, democrats, election, entertainment, hollywood, lewis libby, marvel entertainment, nbc, obama, peter paul, pimped, politics, ron paul, spider man, stan lee, washington| No Comments
