Hillary’s Oval Office Dreams “Truth Boated” By Paul v Clinton?
VICTORY! PAUL v CLINTON WINS 7 YEAR CAMPAIGN TO HOLD HILLARY CLINTON ACCOUNTABLE IN THE COURT OF PUBLIC OPINION!! Hillary Ends Presidential Campaign And Endorses Obama June 5, 2008 On June 12, 2001 Peter Paul filed a landmark civil fraud suit against Hillary and Bill Clinton and related parties, Paul v Clinton et al in Los Angeles Superior Court. The suit was filed by Peter Paul, the Hollywood entrepreneur that Bill Clinton enlisted to become Hillary’s largest 2000 donor. It was the cornerstone of an all out campaign entitled the Hillary Clinton Accountability Project to use every remedy available to a US citizen to expose the public corruption and obstructions of the rule of law directed by Hillary R Clinton with President Clinton and Democratic National Chairman Governor Ed Rendell. Paul v Clinton culminated in the release in January, 2008 of Hillary! Uncensored, the first ever documentary about Hillary Clinton which included exclusive home videos capturing Hillary Clinton engaged in felony violations of federal campaign laws. Hillary! Uncensored became an internet phenomenon when a 13 minute segment titled “The Shocking Video Hillary Doesnt Want You To See” was leaked over the internet on Google and You Tube resulting in more than 8.2 million views from October, 2007- May, 2008- coinciding with Hillary’s drop in the polls and loss to Obama. After personally witnessing, recording and documenting the misconduct and corruption of the Clintons, Paul embarked on a personal campaign to expose the frauds and illegalities directed by Hillary and Bill Clinton to win a Senate seat that would enable the Clinton Family to continue to abuse high public positions as Ex-President and US Senator to enrich themselves, advance their personal quests for power and ensure their ability to corrupt and manipulate any effort to hold them accountable for past, ongoing and future illegalities. Paul’s wealth had been destroyed by the Clintons and those acting on their behalf, and he relied exclusively on the support of tens of thousands of concerned Americans who believed in Paul’s personal quest and supported it with millions of dollars in donations to non profits acting on Paul’s behalf. Paul’s pending civil fraud suit, filed in June, 2001, and refiled in 2003 continues to be obstructed by abuses of legal principles and strategies that were perfected during the Clintons’ eight year tenure in the White House when they dealt with multiple Grand Juries and an Impeachment. But the case continues after the Supreme Court of California refused to dismiss it, and in spite of Court of Appeals actions intended to cripple it. Paul’s complaints to the Federal Election Commission resulted in an admission by Hillary Clinton’s Senate campaign that more than $700,000 of contributions from Paul were hidden and omitted from three false FEC reports resulting in the only fine imposed on Hillary Clinton’s campaign. Paul’s proffers to and cooperation with the Attorney General (Ashcroft) the Asst Atty General, Chertoff and the Chief of Public Integrity resulted in the indictment and trial of Hillary’s finance director David Rosen for 3 counts of causing false FEC reports to be filed that hid more than $800,000 in Paul’s contributions. The first ever documentary produced about Hillary’s political career that used exclusive home videos of the Clintons, taken by Paul with the Clintons’ permission, became a viral internet phenomeneon that caused Google to change its ranking and reporting procedures to protect Hillary from the internet totally overwhelming her campaign. The story of the impact of seven years of publicizing and educating the voters through Paul v Clinton about the contempt for the voters and the Rule of Law displayed y Hillary Clinton in dealing with her top donor in her first election campaign has yet to be written- or even acknowledged- but the truth is out there on the internet if the interest is there to learn the most significant reason why the inevitability of Hillary Clinton’s juggernaut to regain the White House was derailed. Hillary Clinton Waves To Media After Four Hour Testimony before Whitewater Grand Jury- the First First Lady to be Called Before a Criminal Grand Jury Where the Special Prosecutor Stated “She gave factually inaccurate testimony” 
Friday ~ June 06, 2008 by Intermeddler Posted in "Ed Rendell", "hillary uncensored", Al Gore, Barack, Chelsea Clinton, DNC, Hillary, bill clinton, cbs, cheney, current affairs, democrats, election, entertainment, george bush, hillary clinton, hollywood, jim levin, marvel entertainment, obama, peter paul, politics, ron paul, scooter libby, stan lee, tony rezko, washington| 2 Comments
Media Protects Hillary’s Role in Bill Clinton’s Civil Fraud Case in Los Angeles
As the Tony Rezko trial begins in Chicago, Clinton and her surrogates are linking Obama to Rezko and the media is speculating about whether Obama will be called to testify as a witness in the case. Obama has always admitted he received $85,000 in contributions from Rezko which Obama has now donated to charity rather than keep. Yet the civil fraud trial of Bill Clinton for defrauduing Hillary’s largest donor in 2000 into giving her campaign more than $1.2 million, pending in Los Angeles courts since 2003, is now preparing for a November, 2008 trial. The discovery that is now proceeding after a February 21 hearing, and the pending trial, have NEVER been announced by the mainstream media. Hillary was able to extricate herself as a co-defendant in the case in January, 2008 after years of appeals to be protected by the First Amendment from tort claims arising out of federal campaign solicitations she made. Her abuse of the intent of California’s anti-SLAPP law after the California Supreme Court refused to dismiss her from the case in 2004 is emblematic of her contempt for the Rule of Law. Hillary will be called as a witness in both discovery and the trial according to the trial court Judge who so-advised Hillary’s attorney David Kendall when he dismissed Hillary as a co-defendant in 2007. A subpoena is being prepared this month and will be served personally on Hillary, along with Chelsea, Pa Gov. Ed Rendell, Al Gore and other well known political and media figures. Yet the media has refused to report about this landmark civil fraud case- brought by Hillary’s biggest 2000 donor to her Senate race, regarding allegations that were corroborated by the Department of Justice in the criminal trial of Hillary’s finance director David Rosen in May, 2005. That indictment and trial was credited as resulting from the civil suit’s allegations by Peter Paul, the Hollywood dot com millionaire Bill Clinton convinced to donate more than $1.2 million (according to the DOJ prosecutors and the FBI) to Hillary’s Senate campaign as part of a post White House business deal with Bill. The media - except for World Net Daily- has also suspiciously refused to report on Hillary’s last FEC report regarding her 2000 Senate campaign, filed in January 30, 2006. In a secret settlement of an FEC complaint by the plaintiff in Paul v Clinton, Peter Paul, the FEC fined Hillary’s campaign $35,000 for hiding more than $720,000 in donations from Paul, and it required Hillary’s campaign to file a 4th amended FEC report. In that report Hillary and her campaign again hid Paul’s $1.2 million contribution to her campaign and falsely attributed $250,000 as being donated by Paul’s partner, Spider Man creator Stan Lee, who swore in a video taped deposition he never gave Hillary or her campaign any money. Lee did testify to trading $100,000 checks with Paul to make it appear he gave $100,000 to Hillary’s campaign (admission of a felony) but none of that has been reported by the “overly critical” media! Where is the outrage from Obama that the press is engaging in a double standard relating to his possible role in the Rezko trial and his refunding the $85,000 contributed to his campaign by Rezko- which Obama has always admitted taking. The media makes no mention of Hillary’s role as a witness in Bill’s fraud trial for defrauding Hillary’s largest donor- and Hillary’s refusal to refund the $1.2 million she illegally received from Paul, which she has denied taking from Paul ever since the Washington Post asked her about Paul and his felony convictions from the 1970’s before her first Senate election in 2000?
Hillary and Bill Clinton have made a significant issue about how the press is treating Hillary unfairly in their hyper-critical reporting on her and their “softball” reporting on Barak Obama. Hillary maintains she has been fully investigated by the media and Barak hasn’t!
Wednesday ~ March 03, 2008 by Intermeddler Posted in "Ed Rendell", "Norman Hsu", "hillary uncensored", Barack, Chelsea Clinton, DNC, Hillary, Rezko, bill clinton, cheney, democrats, election, entertainment, george bush, hollywood, lewis libby, nbc, obama, peter paul, politics, scooter libby, stan lee, tony rezko, washington| 10 Comments
