Peter Paul

Latest Posts

Search

Ron Paul and Peter Paul- Political Namesakes Challenging the Clinton “Style” Culture of Corruption

What does a Republican Congressman presidential candidate committed to changing the bi-partisan culture of corruption in Washington and a Hollywood entrepreneur dedicated to exposing the Clinton criminality he documented as Hillary’s biggest donor have in common, besides their last name?

Ron Paul’s “Revolution” is the only political campaign led by a presidential candidate that is challenging the Clinton-style culture of corruption and mutual protection racket of the Democrats and Republicans in Washington.

Peter Paul’s Hillary Clinton Accountability Project is the only citizen led legal initiative to use the courts and administrative agencies to expose the serial illegalities and corruption of the branches of government directed by Hillary Clinton. Paul v Clinton uses the courts to expose how Hillary Clinton launched and protected her political career from accountability with the support of the very officials and agencies tasked with prosecuting these illegalities.

The systemic corruption in all branches of government in Washington protested by the Ron Paul Revolution is now being exposed in its most extreme example through Peter Paul’s whistleblowing of the flagrant abuses of power and contempt for the Rule of Law directed in plain view of the media and the government by Bill and Hillary Clinton.

There is now an opportunity to join both of these initiatives through the collective support and internet blogging by Ron Paul Revolutionaries of the prosecution of Peter Paul’s landmark civil fraud case against the Clintons and his administrative complaints. Paul v Clinton is pending in Los Angeles and due to be given a trial date at a hearing set for February 21, 2008 in Los Angeles with Clinton mouthpiece David Kendall and Peter Paul’s lawyers meeting with trial judge Aurelio Munoz.

There is also a mutuality of interests in harnessing the power of the Ron Paul Revolution to catalyze the American electorate to action using the first ever documentary on Hillary Clinton- Hillary!Uncensored- which explains the significance of Paul v Clinton. The rough-cut trailer for the 63 minute documentary was leaked to the public October, 2007 before it was edited and became an internet viral phenomenon in part due to Ron Paul supporters joining in the more than 4.2 million views of the 13 minute trailer of the documentary that has been racked up since October 8.

Monday ~ January 01, 2008 by Intermeddler Posted in "Norman Hsu", "hillary uncensored", DNC, Hillary, Rezko, bill clinton, bush, cbs, cheney, cher, current affairs, democrats, election, entertainment, george bush, hollywood, obama, peter paul, politics, stan lee, washington| 1 Comment

Newsweek’s “Crooked Claims” In Defense of Hillary Clinton Illegalities

We must be making some progress in our effort to break the media blockade surrounding Paul v Clinton et al and its evidence of illegalities directed personally by Hillary Clinton with Bill’s help, that won Hillary a seat in the US Senate and allowed her to avoid accountability ever since.

Since 2001, Hillary Clinton’s corruption of all branches of government that investigated Peter Paul’s complaints of the personal illegalities directed by Hillary to win and keep her Senate seat have resulted in: a sham trial of Hillary’s finance director, a federal judge, appointed by the Clintons, who publicly “threw” a criminal trial and a federal prosecutor who misrepresented material facts to a jury in the case he was prosecuting in order protect Hillary.

The icing on this corrupt cake has been the actions by the FEC in enabling Hillary’s ongoing illegalities (as specifically described by the DOJ prosecutor- denying the public’s right to know of Peter Paul’s $1.2 million personal contribution to Hillary’s campaign) when it allowed Hillary to file a false FEC report on January 30, 2006 which repeated the same crime described by the prosecutor as previously committed by Rosen- denying again the public’s right to know of Peter Paul’s $1.2 million contribution.
Today, seven years after Robert Novak broke the story of Peter Paul’s claims against Hillary Clinton’s election fraud, Newsweek finally deigned to publish a story on the subject. Crooked Claims About Clinton, outsourced by Newsweek to Factcheck.org’s disgraced Time Magazine reporter Viveca Novack, pretended to debunk the recently released unedited 13 minute trailer of the 63 minute unfinished documentary Hillary! Uncensored and Peter Paul’s 7 year crusade to expose Hillary’s frauds to the American people.

This journalistic equivalent of a plugged up colostomy bag takes first prize for its pandering to Clinton apologists who believe that the Clinton Real-Politik trumps the Rule of Law, and any effort to challenge and expose clear evidence of Hillary’s blatant contempt for following the law is a right wing attack job.

The most telling omission that is emblematic of the numerous misrepresentations and material omissions presented by Ms Novack’s story, is its complete silence on Hillary Clinton’s statements to the Washington Post in August 2000, before her election, that she vowed not to take any money from Peter Paul and she declared he had not given any money at all to her largest fundraising event. Then, nine days later she had her finance director fax a new demand that Paul wire untraceable securities worth $100,000 to illegally benefit her campaign through a state committee.

The Department of Justice in May, 2005, told the jury in the criminal trial of Hillary’s finance director David Rosen, that in fact peter Paul was Hillary’s largest donor because he gave more than $1.2 million to pay all expenses for Hillary’s largest fundraiser, the same one Hillary assured voters through the Post that Paul had given no money at all towards!

The article’s mischaracterizations are clearly intended, like the Washington Post Sunday Magazine 8000 word Cover Story in October, 2005 and the New York Times 3000 word story in March, 2005, to insulate and sanitize the impact of Paul’s exposure of the felony contribution solicitations and coordinations conducted by both Clintons to induce Paul’s $1.2 million expenditures and to minimize the impact of the discovery and trial to be set in the Clinton civil fraud case pending in Los Angeles in early 2008.” alt=”Indictment of Hillary’s Finance Director in NY Post” />” alt=”null” />