Hillary Thwarts Judge’s Directive To Testify in Paul v Clinton By Requiring Process Server Catch Her With A Witness Subpoena
Hillary again revealed her contempt for the legal process in an extraordinary development in the Los Angeles Superior Court hearing in the Paul v Clinton et al civil fraud case against Bill and Hillary Clinton today. The business fraud suit being prosecuted by Hillary’s largest donor Peter Paul is finally proceeding to trial after years of delays in the appellate court fight to keep Hillary in the case as a defendant rather than a material witness. Judge Munoz allowed Paul to commence discovery (sworn depositions of witnesses) after a three year hiatus, while agreeing to set a trial date at a hearing to be held in April, 2008. In response, Hillary Clinton’s attorney David Kendall declared that none of Hillary Clinton’s lawyers would accept a deposition subpoena on Hillary’s behalf. Hillary is declaring that she would rather dodge process servers while she is campaigning for President of the United States around the nation than honorably accept a notice of her mandatory deposition through her lawyers!! Hillary Clinton was dismissed as a co-defendant in the case at a hearing in April, 2007 because of democrat Appellate Court Judges’ support of her belated effort to obtain the protection of California’s Anti-SLAPP law from tort fraud conspiracy charges in raising money for her Senate campaign. At that hearing, after dismissing Hillary as a defendant, trial court Judge Aurelio Munoz admonished David Kendall by telling him unequivocally that any effort to deny Senator Clinton’s testimony as a witness in the case would be “Dead on Arrival”. To emphasize his point, the Judge followed his statement by saying “Did you hear that Mr Kendall?” In typical Clintonian hubris and contempt for the judicial process, Hillary had her diminutive counsel with the over inflated ego state to Paul’s lawyer, Colette Wilson, that none of the three lawyers of record representing Hillary in the case would accept a witness subpoena for her deposition on her behalf, and that there would be no cooperation in the process the judge stated should include Hillary’s testimony. The sworn testimony Paul is entitled to take from Hillary as a former defendant and material witness -which the Judge specifically stated he will not allow to be denied- is now being officially thwarted by Senator Hillary R Clinton! Hillary has now made history again in her contempt for the Rule of Law. After being the first First Lady in history to be brought before a grand jury for obstruction of justice in Travelgate and Filegate, she has now become the first US Senator and candidate for president of the United States to refuse to accept a witness subpoena through her lawyers in favor of dodging a process server to avoid testifying truthfully about fraudulent actions that she has failed to deny in the sworn declaration she filed in the case she is called to testify in! What remains to be seen is whether the process server that Hillary will be ducking will be assaulted by Hillary’s Secret Service protectors in the course of serving a legal process on her. Due to the failure of Paul’s former counsel at Judicial Watch to re-serve Clinton agent Jim Levin with the amended complaint before the anti-SLAPP appeals by Rosen and Clinton divested the court of jurisdiction, a trial date for the case was postponed thirty days until Levin is served as a defendant. Levin, who testified as a key witness in the government’s prosecution of Hillary finance director David Rosen that he was designated by Bill Clinton as his “eyes and ears” to deal with Paul, is currently serving three years probation in Chicago for felony fraud on a local school board and others.
Thursday ~ February 02, 2008 by Intermeddler Posted in "Ed Rendell", "Norman Hsu", "don imus", "hillary uncensored", Barack, Chelsea Clinton, DNC, Hillary, Rezko, bill clinton, bush, cbs, cher, current affairs, david rosen, election, entertainment, george bush, hollywood, hsu, imus, lewis libby, marvel entertainment, nbc, peter paul, pimped, politics, race, ron paul, scooter libby, stan lee, washington| 7 Comments
Could the Paul v Clinton Fraud Suit Upset the Clinton Democratic Party?
The landmark civil fraud suit, Paul v Clinton et al pending in Los Angeles Superior Court against the Clintons on and off since 2001 has been hidden from the public by the mainstream media for seven years. While the case was showcased in the documentary trailer for Hillary! Uncensored which made internet history with more than five million downloads in a few weeks in November, 2007, it has remained under the radar of the public consciousness as part of the greatest political scandal cover-up since Watergate. On Thursday, February 21, 2008, a hearing before Judge Munoz will be held in Paul v Clinton with David Kendall representing the Clintons. A trial date will be set for late in 2008 and a discovery schedule will be created for sworn depositions to be taken of all principal witnesses. The limited perception and understanding that exists of the case is that it is simply a business fraud suit by Clinton donor and erstwhile Clinton employer Peter Paul against Bill Clinton who was aided and abetted by Hillary in inducing Paul to spend more than $1.2 million to elect Hillary to the Senate with a false promise to work with paul when Clinton left the White House. Paul and Clinton Review Terms of Employment for Bill’s Post White House Consulting Services August 12, 2000 But the prosecution of the first suit to haul a President and Senator into court for fraud and coercion has the potential of revealing through sworn testimony of the Clinton hierarchy of the Democratic Party the culture of corruption that permeates the party and egregious examples of party leaders including Al Gore, Ed Rendell, Terry McAuliffe as frauds and scofflaws. The threat to the party as well as the Clintons that is posed by the discovery and trial in the suit is that it not only links the Clintons personally to felony violations of the law and obstructions of justice but it will also destroy the credibility of Clinton surrogates who control the party at a time when Obama will be looking to take over the Party with his people. The significance of the lawsuit is that it exposes a broader focus on the Corruption of the Clinton Cabal that has a stranglehold on the Democratic Party. The case represents much more than the frauds that Hillary and Bill directed to win and keep a Senate seat to launch a Presidential campaign from- it has the ability to expose the institutional culture of corruption embraced by the Clinton leadership of the Democratic Party- which is dedicated to assuring the attaining of unaccountable power for the Clintons at the expense of the Rule of Law and respect for the Constitutional processes of government. Witnesses who personally interacted with Paul that will be called to confirm that Paul was illegally expending millions to support Hillary’s campaign solely as a quid pro quo for Bill Clinton’s agreement to serve as a rainmaker for two of his companies for a year as soon as he left the White House. The quid pro quo made between Clinton and Paul subjected Paul’s expenditures to federal maximum limits for his expenditure/in-kind contributions to Hillary’s campaign. The quid pro quo by operation of law made Paul’s donations illegally excessive. Witness/participants include former DNC Chair and Penn. Gov. Ed Rendell- who directed various illegal contributions made by Paul to the DNC and Hillary’s campaign and who failed to report to the FEC Paul’s expenditures of more than $100,000 for a gala for 150 Hollywood people for Al Gore’s campaign and the DNC on June 8, 2000; Terry McAuliffe who counseled Paul in 2 meetings to become a major donor to Hillary to hire Bill; Harold Ickes- who counseled Paul to do what Rendell was suggesting in giving to Hillary’s campaign as a means to hire Bill which facts Ickes hid in his testimony in the Rosen trial, Howard Wolfson- who spoke on behalf of Hillary to the Washington Post about Paul’s in kind contributions of more than $1million to pay for Hillary’s biggest fundraising event. Yet Wolfson has never been interviewed or called as a witness by the DOJ or the FEC to testify to that knowledge either when David Rosen was being indicted and tried for allegedly hiding that same knowledge from Hillary’s campaign. The case that the media refuses to cover will be impossible to ignore when the witnesses from the Clinton Family, DNC leadership, media and Hollywood begin testifying in depositions under oath. Stay tuned to www.hillcap.org
Tuesday ~ February 02, 2008 by Intermeddler Posted in "Ed Rendell", "hillary uncensored", Barack, Chelsea Clinton, DNC, Hillary, Rezko, bill clinton, cbs, cher, current affairs, david geffen, david rosen, democrats, election, entertainment, george bush, hollywood, lewis libby, nbc, obama, peter paul, pimped, politics, ron paul, stan lee, washington| 1 Comment
