Hillary’s Peter Paul Case Trumps Obama’s Wright & Rezko Combined
THE DOCUMENTS DON’T LIE… The Public Record of Peter Paul’s Case Against Hillary Clinton Shows a Massive Corruption of The Government and the Media Enabling The Serial Frauds and Illegalities that Won Hillary’s Senate Seat and Obstructed Her Accountability- Enabling Her Race for the White House PaulvClinton.com links all the original court pleadings and government documents, letters, published articles and photos associated with the landmark civil fraud suit Paul v Clinton et al that has now begun discovery for a trial in early 2009. It provides independent and irrefutable evidence of the frauds directed by the Clintons against not only Peter Paul, but also against the voters of New York, Hillary Clinton’s 2000 Senate opponent, the Federal Election Commission, the IRS, the FBI, the Justice Department Office of Public Integrity, the U.S. Senate, the Inspector General, Federal Courts, Grand Juries, and the shareholders of Stan Lee Media. The sole object of these frauds and serial illegalities were to assure the election and then re-election of Hillary Clinton to the Senate and to thwart and obstruct all investigations into those frauds to protect Hillary and Bill Clinton from accountability to the law and to advance their ambitions to regain the White House. The evidence from sworn testimony in court transcripts, FBI declarations, FEC General Counsel reports and investigations, Washington Post stories and original letters, photos and videos present irrefutable proof of a collusion between a sitting U.S. President, a First Lady turned U.S. Senator, and then Chairman of the Democratic Party Ed Rendell to defraud a Hollywood businessman of $2 million and destroy him and his public company in order to generate the largest campaign contribution, made at a President’s request for a quid pro quo, to benefit the Senate candidate. Thereafter corruption by the Clintons of every branch of government that investigated their collusion covered up the illegalities involved and enabled them to avoid accountability from the public and all regulatory and investigatory federal agencies and the federal judiciary. The evidence presented clearly supports the reasonable conclusion that the Clintons have succeeded in exempting themselves from the Rule of Law in the United States and from meaningful scrutiny and exposure by the media at large. These recent documents and the statements by the Department of Justice Office of Public Integrity Prosecutor explain it all: Federal Election Commission Complaint - December 31, 2007 Peter Paul asks the FEC to void its previous conciliation agreement granting immunity to Hillary Clinton and New York Senate 2000, and to investigate illegal solicitation and coordination of illegal campaign contributions and ongoing violations of reporting laws by Sen. Clinton and her agents. Declaration Against Hillary Clinton By Peter Paul March, 2007 Responsive Declaration by Hillary R Clinton, April, 2007 Statement of Hillary Clinton’s Illegalities to California Appellate Court- They find she might have committed them! See also the Closing Statement to the Jury by Department of Justice Office of Public Integrity prosecutor Dan Schwager in the 2005 trial of Clinton campaign finance director David Rosen. Schwager said that the crime being prosecuted by the government was denying the public’s right to know about Peter Paul’s $1.2 million contribution to Hillary’s campaign, and continued efforts to obstruct that right by filing three false FEC reports - felony charges for which Rosen faced 15 years in jail. Nevertheless, the Federal Election Commission subsequently allowed Hillary and her campaign to file a fourth false report, which the FEC used as a basis to settle all previous violations and immunize the defendants from further investigation. Hillary Clinton Denies Paul Gave Any Money to Washington Post query, and Vows Not To Take Any 3 Days After Paul’s $1.2 Million Fundraiser For Hillary Hillary Clinton Letter to Peter Paul “with gratitude for his friendship” dated a day after second Washington Post article denying his contribution
Thursday ~ May 05, 2008 by Intermeddler Posted in "Ed Rendell", "Norman Hsu", "hillary uncensored", Al Gore, Barack, DNC, Hillary, Rezko, bill clinton, election, entertainment, hollywood, judge munoz, lewis libby, obama, peter paul, politics, race, tony rezko, washington| 5 Comments
Media Protects Hillary’s Role in Bill Clinton’s Civil Fraud Case in Los Angeles
As the Tony Rezko trial begins in Chicago, Clinton and her surrogates are linking Obama to Rezko and the media is speculating about whether Obama will be called to testify as a witness in the case. Obama has always admitted he received $85,000 in contributions from Rezko which Obama has now donated to charity rather than keep. Yet the civil fraud trial of Bill Clinton for defrauduing Hillary’s largest donor in 2000 into giving her campaign more than $1.2 million, pending in Los Angeles courts since 2003, is now preparing for a November, 2008 trial. The discovery that is now proceeding after a February 21 hearing, and the pending trial, have NEVER been announced by the mainstream media. Hillary was able to extricate herself as a co-defendant in the case in January, 2008 after years of appeals to be protected by the First Amendment from tort claims arising out of federal campaign solicitations she made. Her abuse of the intent of California’s anti-SLAPP law after the California Supreme Court refused to dismiss her from the case in 2004 is emblematic of her contempt for the Rule of Law. Hillary will be called as a witness in both discovery and the trial according to the trial court Judge who so-advised Hillary’s attorney David Kendall when he dismissed Hillary as a co-defendant in 2007. A subpoena is being prepared this month and will be served personally on Hillary, along with Chelsea, Pa Gov. Ed Rendell, Al Gore and other well known political and media figures. Yet the media has refused to report about this landmark civil fraud case- brought by Hillary’s biggest 2000 donor to her Senate race, regarding allegations that were corroborated by the Department of Justice in the criminal trial of Hillary’s finance director David Rosen in May, 2005. That indictment and trial was credited as resulting from the civil suit’s allegations by Peter Paul, the Hollywood dot com millionaire Bill Clinton convinced to donate more than $1.2 million (according to the DOJ prosecutors and the FBI) to Hillary’s Senate campaign as part of a post White House business deal with Bill. The media - except for World Net Daily- has also suspiciously refused to report on Hillary’s last FEC report regarding her 2000 Senate campaign, filed in January 30, 2006. In a secret settlement of an FEC complaint by the plaintiff in Paul v Clinton, Peter Paul, the FEC fined Hillary’s campaign $35,000 for hiding more than $720,000 in donations from Paul, and it required Hillary’s campaign to file a 4th amended FEC report. In that report Hillary and her campaign again hid Paul’s $1.2 million contribution to her campaign and falsely attributed $250,000 as being donated by Paul’s partner, Spider Man creator Stan Lee, who swore in a video taped deposition he never gave Hillary or her campaign any money. Lee did testify to trading $100,000 checks with Paul to make it appear he gave $100,000 to Hillary’s campaign (admission of a felony) but none of that has been reported by the “overly critical” media! Where is the outrage from Obama that the press is engaging in a double standard relating to his possible role in the Rezko trial and his refunding the $85,000 contributed to his campaign by Rezko- which Obama has always admitted taking. The media makes no mention of Hillary’s role as a witness in Bill’s fraud trial for defrauding Hillary’s largest donor- and Hillary’s refusal to refund the $1.2 million she illegally received from Paul, which she has denied taking from Paul ever since the Washington Post asked her about Paul and his felony convictions from the 1970’s before her first Senate election in 2000?
Hillary and Bill Clinton have made a significant issue about how the press is treating Hillary unfairly in their hyper-critical reporting on her and their “softball” reporting on Barak Obama. Hillary maintains she has been fully investigated by the media and Barak hasn’t!
Wednesday ~ March 03, 2008 by Intermeddler Posted in "Ed Rendell", "Norman Hsu", "hillary uncensored", Barack, Chelsea Clinton, DNC, Hillary, Rezko, bill clinton, cheney, democrats, election, entertainment, george bush, hollywood, lewis libby, nbc, obama, peter paul, politics, scooter libby, stan lee, tony rezko, washington| 10 Comments
