Obama Rezko Grilling Proves Media Double Standard Covering Up Hillary Clinton’s Galagate
Have the media’s demands that Obama personally explain his relationship with Tony Rezko been orchestrated by Clinton forces confident that Hillary will never be questioned about Peter Paul? How can the media demand Obama personally meet with the editorial board of the Chicago Tribune to be grilled for hours about his Rezko relationship while they have and continue to refuse to ask Hillary Clinton ANY questions about her relationship with her top 2000 donor, Peter Paul? Hillary has refused to personally admit she took any of the $1.2 million plus the Department of Justice prosecuted her finance director for hiding in 2005. The media continue to hide a political scandal- dwarfing anything Obama has been linked to with Rezko- that is on a par with Watergate!! The cover-up of the illegalities Hillary directed to win her Senate seat and the obstructions of justice she orchestrated to keep it and avoid accountability have been intentionally hidden from the public by the media and the government. The media has imposed a blackout on any assessments of Hillary’s relationship with Peter Paul that led to the indictment and trial of her finance director and the only fine levied against her Senate campaign by the FEC. No mention has been made of the quid pro quo arranged by Bill Clinton to induce Paul’s becoming Hillary’s top donor, or of the reported deceptions quoted from her in the Washington Post about not taking money from Peter Paul after Hillary had just taken more than $1.2 million from him, and days BEFORE Hillary faxed a demand for another $100,000 in untraceable securities to be wired to a state committee in NY that could hide the contribution from the FEC According to the Department of Justice’s Office of Public Integrity in statements by prosecutors in May, 2005 - it is a felony to “deny the public the right to know Peter Paul personally contributed more than $1.2 million to Hillary Clinton’s Senate campaign” (Pp 52,55,74,79 Dan Schwager’s Jury Summation, USA v Rosen) Commencing on August 14, 2000, through the present day- Hillary has denied accepting any money at all from Hollywood Dot com Millionaire Peter Paul through two deceptive articles in the Washington Post, false statements by Hillary’s attorney David Kendall, four false FEC reports, false statements to FEC investigators and General Counsel and a false sworn declaration in the civil fraud case that included Hillary as a co-defendant- Paul v Clinton. Hillary has refused to correct her January 30, 2006 FEC report (Pages 34-35 re:Event 39-The Gala Hollywood salute to President Clinton, which itself is a crime. This report misstates that a payment of $839,000 was made by Hillary’s campaign to two of Peter Paul’s dummy companies, Excelsior and Paraversal, (instead reporting the in kind donation of $1.2 million as explained by the FBI and DOJ in the Rosen case) The false FEC report also states that $225,000 was a personal contribution from Stan Lee - even though Lee has sworn he made no such donation, as he confirmed under oath in a videotape deposition. While Hillary Clinton has repeatedly chastised Barak Obama for his relationship with, and contributions from Illinois political fixer Tony Rezko- even though Obama always admitted receiving Rezkp’s contributions and then refunded them- Hillary refuses to admit soiciting and coordinating $1.2 million plus from Peter Paul and the relationship she and Bill established with him that caused him to become her biggest donor to her Senate race by a magnitude of 3 ! The media has never demanded Hillary personally respond to any question about Hillary and Bill Clinton’s connection with Paul. Paul caused the indictment and trial of Hillary’s finance director for defrauding the FEC and the only fine to be imposed by the FEC on Hillary’s Senate campaign- for knowingly filing 3 false reports that hid more than $720,000 donated by Paul. 
Wednesday ~ March 03, 2008 by Intermeddler Posted in "Ed Rendell", "Norman Hsu", "hillary uncensored", Al Gore, Barack, Chelsea Clinton, DNC, Hillary, Rezko, bill clinton, current affairs, david rosen, democrats, election, entertainment, hollywood, hsu, jim levin, nbc, obama, peter paul, politics, race, stan lee, tony rezko, washington| 2 Comments
Media Protects Hillary’s Role in Bill Clinton’s Civil Fraud Case in Los Angeles
As the Tony Rezko trial begins in Chicago, Clinton and her surrogates are linking Obama to Rezko and the media is speculating about whether Obama will be called to testify as a witness in the case. Obama has always admitted he received $85,000 in contributions from Rezko which Obama has now donated to charity rather than keep. Yet the civil fraud trial of Bill Clinton for defrauduing Hillary’s largest donor in 2000 into giving her campaign more than $1.2 million, pending in Los Angeles courts since 2003, is now preparing for a November, 2008 trial. The discovery that is now proceeding after a February 21 hearing, and the pending trial, have NEVER been announced by the mainstream media. Hillary was able to extricate herself as a co-defendant in the case in January, 2008 after years of appeals to be protected by the First Amendment from tort claims arising out of federal campaign solicitations she made. Her abuse of the intent of California’s anti-SLAPP law after the California Supreme Court refused to dismiss her from the case in 2004 is emblematic of her contempt for the Rule of Law. Hillary will be called as a witness in both discovery and the trial according to the trial court Judge who so-advised Hillary’s attorney David Kendall when he dismissed Hillary as a co-defendant in 2007. A subpoena is being prepared this month and will be served personally on Hillary, along with Chelsea, Pa Gov. Ed Rendell, Al Gore and other well known political and media figures. Yet the media has refused to report about this landmark civil fraud case- brought by Hillary’s biggest 2000 donor to her Senate race, regarding allegations that were corroborated by the Department of Justice in the criminal trial of Hillary’s finance director David Rosen in May, 2005. That indictment and trial was credited as resulting from the civil suit’s allegations by Peter Paul, the Hollywood dot com millionaire Bill Clinton convinced to donate more than $1.2 million (according to the DOJ prosecutors and the FBI) to Hillary’s Senate campaign as part of a post White House business deal with Bill. The media - except for World Net Daily- has also suspiciously refused to report on Hillary’s last FEC report regarding her 2000 Senate campaign, filed in January 30, 2006. In a secret settlement of an FEC complaint by the plaintiff in Paul v Clinton, Peter Paul, the FEC fined Hillary’s campaign $35,000 for hiding more than $720,000 in donations from Paul, and it required Hillary’s campaign to file a 4th amended FEC report. In that report Hillary and her campaign again hid Paul’s $1.2 million contribution to her campaign and falsely attributed $250,000 as being donated by Paul’s partner, Spider Man creator Stan Lee, who swore in a video taped deposition he never gave Hillary or her campaign any money. Lee did testify to trading $100,000 checks with Paul to make it appear he gave $100,000 to Hillary’s campaign (admission of a felony) but none of that has been reported by the “overly critical” media! Where is the outrage from Obama that the press is engaging in a double standard relating to his possible role in the Rezko trial and his refunding the $85,000 contributed to his campaign by Rezko- which Obama has always admitted taking. The media makes no mention of Hillary’s role as a witness in Bill’s fraud trial for defrauding Hillary’s largest donor- and Hillary’s refusal to refund the $1.2 million she illegally received from Paul, which she has denied taking from Paul ever since the Washington Post asked her about Paul and his felony convictions from the 1970’s before her first Senate election in 2000?
Hillary and Bill Clinton have made a significant issue about how the press is treating Hillary unfairly in their hyper-critical reporting on her and their “softball” reporting on Barak Obama. Hillary maintains she has been fully investigated by the media and Barak hasn’t!
Wednesday ~ March 03, 2008 by Intermeddler Posted in "Ed Rendell", "Norman Hsu", "hillary uncensored", Barack, Chelsea Clinton, DNC, Hillary, Rezko, bill clinton, cheney, democrats, election, entertainment, george bush, hollywood, lewis libby, nbc, obama, peter paul, politics, scooter libby, stan lee, tony rezko, washington| 10 Comments
