Is Hillary Helping To Hide Felon Fundraiser Friend Jim Levin From Bill Clinton Fraud Trial?
Paul v Clinton et al, the California civil fraud suit pending against Bill Clinton (and Grammys producer Gary Smith) brought by the Hollywood dot com millionaire who Bill enlisted as Hillary’s top 2000 donor and then defrauded and destroyed his public company, will be set for trial as soon as co-defendant and Clinton intimate Jim Levin is served a new Summons and complaint. (See You Tube that explains the story) Jim Levin was a key government witness against his former mentor and friend, Hillary Clinton national finance director David Rosen, in a criminal election law fraud trial in Los Angeles in May, 2005. Rosen was indicted by the Justice Department for hiding the $1.2 million plus cost of the Hillary fundraising Gala, paid for by Paul personally, from Hillary’s campaign, causing Hillary to file 3 false FEC reports. Levin was convicted in December of 2006 of various frauds on Chicago schools and was sentenced to probation because of his cooperation with the government as a witness in the Rosen trial and alleged other cooperation he is still engaging in. Levin has been evading service of the Summons in the Paul v Clinton case since 2004. Now that the California court ruled on February 21 that a trial date for Bill Clinton will be set as soon as Levin is served with his copy of the complaint, the race is on to find Levin. A member of Paul’s legal team attempted to enlist the aid of the US Probation Office in Chicago to assure that Levin could not obstruct justice while on probation by evading service of a lawful summons. It is the duty of every convicted felon on probation to faithfully comply with all laws and regulations. Since it is the duty of the Probation Office to monitor the actions of probationers to ensure they comply with the law- it is surprising when the Probation Office advises an officer of the Court that they will not intercede to require their probationer to desist from obstructing a court process by hiding his location. When it comes to those who the Clintons have a reason to protect for their own well being, they have a facility to turn the judicial system on its head. Rosen’s case was tried before a Clinton appointed Federal Judge Matz. Matz abused his ethical requirements for judicial impartiality when he began the trial by declaring to the jury and the media that Hillary had no involvement whatsoever in the illegal fundraising charges. ( A statement contradicted by a video tape of Hillary talking to underwriter Paul the day he began paying for the event). The judge also said that the government’s key witness, Peter Paul, was a con man. the judge knew that Rosen’s defense was going to be that he was conned by Paul who hid the price of the gala from him. Judge Matz’ prejudicial remarks to the jury about the key witness that the Defendant Rosen built his case on discrediting, the ensured the jury could not possibly convict Rosen beyond a reasonable doubt. This egregious violation of ethics by the Judge - knowingly throwing the trial- was never objected to by the DOJ Prosecutors (the same two who tried the Lewis Libby case), who joined with the Judge in opening remarks to the jury that made it clear Hillary had nothing whatever to do with the case. The trial became a Soviet style show trial with Levin paraded by the government as their star witness. The reality was that the same Chief of Public Integrity who masterminded the Rosen indictment and trial, Noel Hillman, also masterminded the “non” prosecution of National Security document thief and destroyer Sandy Berger. Hillman worked closely from 2002-2005 with Paul’s attorneys to completely understand the Clintons’ role in the felony solicitation and coordination of Paul’s $1.2 million plus contributions, and the hiding of that contribution from voters and the FEC. Yet he misrepresented their role in the affair to the jury in the Rosen case to exculpate the Clintons. Since Mr Hillman was promoted to the lifetime position of Federal Judge in New Jersey before Rep Tom Davis, Chairman of the Govt Reform Cmtee in the House accused him of obstructing the 9-11 Commission investigation, Hillman was never challenged on his actions in obstructing justice in both the Berger and Rosen prosecutions- all apparently designed to protect the Clintons.
Friday ~ March 03, 2008 by Intermeddler Posted in "Ed Rendell", "Norman Hsu", "hillary uncensored", Barack, Chelsea Clinton, DNC, Hillary, Rezko, bill clinton, bush, current affairs, david rosen, democrats, election, entertainment, hollywood, jim levin, obama, peter paul, politics, race, ron paul, stan lee, tony rezko, washington| 1 Comment
Media Protects Hillary’s Role in Bill Clinton’s Civil Fraud Case in Los Angeles
As the Tony Rezko trial begins in Chicago, Clinton and her surrogates are linking Obama to Rezko and the media is speculating about whether Obama will be called to testify as a witness in the case. Obama has always admitted he received $85,000 in contributions from Rezko which Obama has now donated to charity rather than keep. Yet the civil fraud trial of Bill Clinton for defrauduing Hillary’s largest donor in 2000 into giving her campaign more than $1.2 million, pending in Los Angeles courts since 2003, is now preparing for a November, 2008 trial. The discovery that is now proceeding after a February 21 hearing, and the pending trial, have NEVER been announced by the mainstream media. Hillary was able to extricate herself as a co-defendant in the case in January, 2008 after years of appeals to be protected by the First Amendment from tort claims arising out of federal campaign solicitations she made. Her abuse of the intent of California’s anti-SLAPP law after the California Supreme Court refused to dismiss her from the case in 2004 is emblematic of her contempt for the Rule of Law. Hillary will be called as a witness in both discovery and the trial according to the trial court Judge who so-advised Hillary’s attorney David Kendall when he dismissed Hillary as a co-defendant in 2007. A subpoena is being prepared this month and will be served personally on Hillary, along with Chelsea, Pa Gov. Ed Rendell, Al Gore and other well known political and media figures. Yet the media has refused to report about this landmark civil fraud case- brought by Hillary’s biggest 2000 donor to her Senate race, regarding allegations that were corroborated by the Department of Justice in the criminal trial of Hillary’s finance director David Rosen in May, 2005. That indictment and trial was credited as resulting from the civil suit’s allegations by Peter Paul, the Hollywood dot com millionaire Bill Clinton convinced to donate more than $1.2 million (according to the DOJ prosecutors and the FBI) to Hillary’s Senate campaign as part of a post White House business deal with Bill. The media - except for World Net Daily- has also suspiciously refused to report on Hillary’s last FEC report regarding her 2000 Senate campaign, filed in January 30, 2006. In a secret settlement of an FEC complaint by the plaintiff in Paul v Clinton, Peter Paul, the FEC fined Hillary’s campaign $35,000 for hiding more than $720,000 in donations from Paul, and it required Hillary’s campaign to file a 4th amended FEC report. In that report Hillary and her campaign again hid Paul’s $1.2 million contribution to her campaign and falsely attributed $250,000 as being donated by Paul’s partner, Spider Man creator Stan Lee, who swore in a video taped deposition he never gave Hillary or her campaign any money. Lee did testify to trading $100,000 checks with Paul to make it appear he gave $100,000 to Hillary’s campaign (admission of a felony) but none of that has been reported by the “overly critical” media! Where is the outrage from Obama that the press is engaging in a double standard relating to his possible role in the Rezko trial and his refunding the $85,000 contributed to his campaign by Rezko- which Obama has always admitted taking. The media makes no mention of Hillary’s role as a witness in Bill’s fraud trial for defrauding Hillary’s largest donor- and Hillary’s refusal to refund the $1.2 million she illegally received from Paul, which she has denied taking from Paul ever since the Washington Post asked her about Paul and his felony convictions from the 1970’s before her first Senate election in 2000?
Hillary and Bill Clinton have made a significant issue about how the press is treating Hillary unfairly in their hyper-critical reporting on her and their “softball” reporting on Barak Obama. Hillary maintains she has been fully investigated by the media and Barak hasn’t!
Wednesday ~ March 03, 2008 by Intermeddler Posted in "Ed Rendell", "Norman Hsu", "hillary uncensored", Barack, Chelsea Clinton, DNC, Hillary, Rezko, bill clinton, cheney, democrats, election, entertainment, george bush, hollywood, lewis libby, nbc, obama, peter paul, politics, scooter libby, stan lee, tony rezko, washington| 10 Comments
