McClellan Gives Up Bush vs. Wolfson Covers For Hillary’s Illegalities
Hillary has protested her unequal treatment by the media. We agree wholeheartedly that the media should treat her and her relationship with her Press Secretary Howard Wolfson with the same enthusiastic analysis as it is treating George Bush and his press secretary, Scott McClelllan. . This might help…. Yesterday the press began a frenzied dissection of all of the intimate details of Bush Administration officials’ duplicity as exposed by Scott McClellan in his just released book. McClellan’s disingenuousness in aiding Bush propaganda and deception of the public by McClellan and his administration bosses, poses ethical problems for McClellan, but does not appear to rise to the level of a criminal violation of the public trust. Yet the media has shown no interest whatsoever in exposing the role Hillary’s personal and campaign spokesman, Howard Wolfson, played with Hillary Clinton in illegally soliciting, coordinating and then covering up the $1.2 million plus campaign contributions made by Peter Paul that Justice Department Prosecutors and the FBI have stated in federal court that Paul personally made to Hillary’s campaign in 2000. The media appears concerned that Mr McClellan is trying to cash in on a very belated sense of ethics and concern for the very public deception he himself facilitated for members of the Bush administration he worked with as their spokesman. His failure to protest in any way what he allegedly witnessed and how he was misled during his ten year tenure with Bush is being used by the media to impugn the truthfulness of his allegations. In the case of Hillary Clinton’s long term spokesman, Howard Wolfson, who has worked with Hillary since she began her political career with her 2000 Senate race, the media refuses to mention, let alone dissect, the abundant evidence in the public record that Wolfson facilitated felonious illegalities by both Clintons in the course of Hillary winning the 2000 Senate election, and then in obstructing all federal investigations into those illegalities ever since. The Washington Post articles on August 15 and 17, 2000 contain quotes from Wolfson speaking on behalf of Hillary Clinton- in response to direct questions posed to Mrs Clinton by reporter Lloyd Grove-that evidence two crimes committed by Mrs. Clinton. The quotes in those articles (found here and here) confirm that Hillary Clinton, in cahoots with Howard Wolfson (who was privy to a conference call he participated in with Hillary’s top donor about the $1 million budget for the Gala) intended to deny the public’s right to know that Peter Paul personally gave $1.2 million plus to Hillary’s Senate campaign. Both Hillary and Wolfson knew that the Gala produced by Paul “cost more than $1 million and was an in kind contribution” to Hillary’s campaign after they solicited the money and coordinated its expenditure with him. The significance of these two statements and omissions by Hillary through Wolfson, unlike McClellan, a supposed dupe of the Bush duplicity, is that the denial of the public’s right to know that Paul made the contribution solicited and coordinated by Hillary and Wolfson was a felony. The knowledge that the Gala Paul produced cost more than $1 million when the Post article was published in August, 2000 evidences an effort to hide the cost by Hillary and Wolfson in false FEC reports that were made by Hillary’s campaign in October, 2000, January, 2001 and July, 2001 stating the Gala cost $366,000. Knowing in August, 2000, that the cost of this fundraiser was in excess of $1 million meant that Hillary’s finance director, David Rosen, who was indicted and tried in federal court in 2005 for hiding the true $1 million plus cost of the event from Hillary’s campaign , was wrongly indicted and forced to defend a federal criminal trial! The prosecution of Rosen for causing false FEC reports understating the cost of the Gala, with knowledge by prosecutors of Wolfson’s quotes on Hillary’s behalf in the Post, was a vast obstruction of justice intended to hide the government’s knowledge of a conference call that Wolfosn participated in with Hillary Clinton White House staffer Kelly Craighead and Peter Paul that detailed the budget for the event- and provided knowledge to Hillary long before the first media and FEC reports were made. So in an appeal to the media to treat Hillary equally in the press, why not look at the record available on the www.paulvclinton.com web site to view the public record linked there that clearly shows Hillary’s spokesman deceived, on Hillary’s behalf and behest, the voters of New York about Peter Paul’s contributions to Hillary’s Senate campaign, and then hid the knowledge of the cost of the Gala Paul produced from the Department of Justice and FEC so that David Rosen would take the rap for Hillary’s false and illegal FEC reports!
Scott McClellan’s revelations about his experiences as White House Press Secretary with Bush Administration duplicities are in stark contrast with Hillary Clinton’s spokesman, Howard Wolfson’s role (hidden in plain sight on the public record) in aiding and abetting Hillary Clinton in serial campaign and obstruction illegalities.
Wednesday ~ May 05, 2008 by Intermeddler Posted in "Ed Rendell", "hillary uncensored", DNC, Hillary, Rezko, bill clinton, bush, current affairs, david rosen, democrats, election, entertainment, george bush, hillary clinton, obama, peter paul, politics, race, tony rezko, washington| 2 Comments
Rush Limbaugh And The New VRWC To Elect Hillary Clinton?
Conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh may have shown Friday that he is joining former Clinton arch-enemies Richard Mellon Scaife, Matt Drudge, News Max publisher Chris Ruddy, Bill O’Reilly and Sean Hannity in either flat out supporting Hillary publicly, or providing a strategic media coverage of her and her campaign intended to help her more than hurt her chances to win against Obama and possibly regain the White House. All of these named conservatives have been presented with detailed information and evidence to educate them on the illegalities Hillary directed to win her Senate seat and avoid accountability- NONE of them have ever accurately reported the facts to the public. When Peter Paul was invited to present his allegations against Hillary on the Hannity and Colmes show in March, 2005, after Hillary’s finance director David Rosen was indicted on three counts of election fraud for hiding from the public the fact that Peter Paul personally gave more than $1.2 million to Hillary’s Senate campaign (by supposedly causing Hillary’s campaign to file 3 false FEC reports, according to Dept of Justice prosecutors), he was not supported in any way by Sean Hannity while Alan Colmes screamed over Paul’s answers to his questions. Alan Colmes shouted repeatedly at Paul “Where is your evidence of Hillary’s personal role in the matter”. Paul’s documentary evidence was not accepted. Sean Hannity appeared befuddled and unable to grasp the basics of Paul’s claims and quickly changed the subject. Two years later, when Paul forced the US Attorney in NY to release a video Paul took of Hillary’s personal role in helping and coordinating with Paul the expenditures on her behalf, Paul presented the video of Hillary’s personal role in the matter that Colmes repeatedly screamed at Paul to produce- to Colmes and Hannity and asked them to allow him to finally refute Colmes on the Hannity show. Paul was ignored by the producers and Hannity, and never given the courtesy of a response. Since then, Hannity has refused since May, 2005 to make any comments on Paul’s landmark civil fraud suit against the Clintons as it prepares to go trial!. After Drudge, Scaife and Ruddy came out with varying efforts to support Hillary, now Rush Limbaugh seems to have joined the pack. On Friday afternoon (May 2) Rush responded to a caller’s direct inquiry about how Hillary escaped any accountability whatsoever in the Paul affair with a Hannity like befuddled, confusing and wholly inaccurate and inarticulate answer intended to skirt the issue and its ongoing significance in the civil courts. Rush knows that the Paul v Clinton civil fraud suit has now been cleared by the judge to proceed with discovery which will include sworn depositions from Bill, Chelsea, Hillary (after the election) Al Gore, Howard Wolfson, Ed Rendell, Larry King and many other notable personalities, yet he made no mention of that development in his response to the caller’s question! Rush and the rest of the conservative talk hosts have collectively boycotted and dissembled incredible developments in this case- to what end can only be speculated. When Hillary’s finance director was indicted and tried for hiding Paul’s $1.2 million plus contribution and Teddy Kennedy’s brother in law became a federal snitch who was wired by the FBI to set up that finance director in conversations that would incriminate Clinton- and then when that tape was withheld by the prosecutor over the Judge’s initial objection- the case continued with videotaped admissions by pop culture icon Stan Lee that he “traded” a $100,000 contribution check to Hillary’s campaign with Peter Paul, when the smoking gun tape of Hillary calling Paul to help him expend his $1.2 million on her behalf- when all of this has been intentionally ignored and mis-reported- some may call it a conspiracy! Here’s is the latest transcropt showing Rush joining Hannity in being incapable of understanding Hillary’s illegalities that are on the public record: RUSH: Here is Shannon in Fort Worth, Texas. I’m glad you waited. Welcome to the EIB Network. CALLER: Good afternoon, Rush. I want to get straight to the point. I want to know, in your opinion, who has the best integrity of the Democratic candidates. Would it be Hillary or Obama, and I want to take you back a little bit to the 2000 Peter Paul scandal of Mrs. Clinton. I’m surprised she’s still in politics. I’m surprised that she’s not in jail after that, and in your opinion, I want you to explain why you think that she was able to get out of that scot-free, because it did not appear as if she was held accountable for any of that? RUSH: ‘Cause she didn’t know about it. CALLER: Well – RUSH: She didn’t know about it, Shannon. Here’s the story on this Peter Paul business, as best as I understand it. They had this big-time fundraiser out there in Los Angeles somewhere, and he was one of the organizers at a fundraiser, and a lot of the money that went into staging the thing, they contracted out, just counted that as a campaign contribution. They took much more money out of the event than it raised and converted it to campaign funds for Mrs. Clinton. But she didn’t know anything about it. This woman doesn’t know anything. She’s ready to lead from day one, but she doesn’t know anything. She doesn’t know anything that happens in her own house. She doesn’t know anything that happens in her own bedroom. She doesn’t know anything that happens in her own husband’s administration. She doesn’t know anything, her mind is Jell-O. And since nobody had any proof that she knew about it, that’s why. What was the other question, who has the most integrity between Obama and Hillary? CALLER: Yeah, who do you view as being more honest and has more integrity? RUSH: Jeez. (laughing) This is a case of two negatives. Which is the least dishonest, is the most appropriate question. CALLER: I think that’s a more accurate question, but in your opinion — because I think Mrs. Clinton is beatable, and I think it’s because every time that she makes a statement, she’s proven, you know, with the sniper fire and all this stuff, she’s proven that she can’t be honest, she can’t tell the truth. And there you have it folks! (Rush would say) Rush appears to have sold out to Don Imus’ Great Satan, and sold his audience out denying them the true facts that even the California Appellate Court judges appointed by Gray Davis had to admit- that Hillary may well have used illegalities to win her Senate seat and keep it but who is gonna stop her? Who will go against her and her malevolent political machine? Clearly not those who made names for themselves in the 90’s as part of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy who have now become the Vast Right Wing Friends of Hillary!
Saturday ~ May 05, 2008 by Intermeddler Posted in "Ed Rendell", "Norman Hsu", "don imus", "hillary uncensored", Al Gore, Barack, DNC, Hillary, Rezko, bill clinton, cher, current affairs, democrats, election, judge munoz, obama, peter paul, politics, race, stan lee, tony rezko| 6 Comments
