Hillary’s Oval Office Dreams “Truth Boated” By Paul v Clinton?
VICTORY! PAUL v CLINTON WINS 7 YEAR CAMPAIGN TO HOLD HILLARY CLINTON ACCOUNTABLE IN THE COURT OF PUBLIC OPINION!! Hillary Ends Presidential Campaign And Endorses Obama June 5, 2008 On June 12, 2001 Peter Paul filed a landmark civil fraud suit against Hillary and Bill Clinton and related parties, Paul v Clinton et al in Los Angeles Superior Court. The suit was filed by Peter Paul, the Hollywood entrepreneur that Bill Clinton enlisted to become Hillary’s largest 2000 donor. It was the cornerstone of an all out campaign entitled the Hillary Clinton Accountability Project to use every remedy available to a US citizen to expose the public corruption and obstructions of the rule of law directed by Hillary R Clinton with President Clinton and Democratic National Chairman Governor Ed Rendell. Paul v Clinton culminated in the release in January, 2008 of Hillary! Uncensored, the first ever documentary about Hillary Clinton which included exclusive home videos capturing Hillary Clinton engaged in felony violations of federal campaign laws. Hillary! Uncensored became an internet phenomenon when a 13 minute segment titled “The Shocking Video Hillary Doesnt Want You To See” was leaked over the internet on Google and You Tube resulting in more than 8.2 million views from October, 2007- May, 2008- coinciding with Hillary’s drop in the polls and loss to Obama. After personally witnessing, recording and documenting the misconduct and corruption of the Clintons, Paul embarked on a personal campaign to expose the frauds and illegalities directed by Hillary and Bill Clinton to win a Senate seat that would enable the Clinton Family to continue to abuse high public positions as Ex-President and US Senator to enrich themselves, advance their personal quests for power and ensure their ability to corrupt and manipulate any effort to hold them accountable for past, ongoing and future illegalities. Paul’s wealth had been destroyed by the Clintons and those acting on their behalf, and he relied exclusively on the support of tens of thousands of concerned Americans who believed in Paul’s personal quest and supported it with millions of dollars in donations to non profits acting on Paul’s behalf. Paul’s pending civil fraud suit, filed in June, 2001, and refiled in 2003 continues to be obstructed by abuses of legal principles and strategies that were perfected during the Clintons’ eight year tenure in the White House when they dealt with multiple Grand Juries and an Impeachment. But the case continues after the Supreme Court of California refused to dismiss it, and in spite of Court of Appeals actions intended to cripple it. Paul’s complaints to the Federal Election Commission resulted in an admission by Hillary Clinton’s Senate campaign that more than $700,000 of contributions from Paul were hidden and omitted from three false FEC reports resulting in the only fine imposed on Hillary Clinton’s campaign. Paul’s proffers to and cooperation with the Attorney General (Ashcroft) the Asst Atty General, Chertoff and the Chief of Public Integrity resulted in the indictment and trial of Hillary’s finance director David Rosen for 3 counts of causing false FEC reports to be filed that hid more than $800,000 in Paul’s contributions. The first ever documentary produced about Hillary’s political career that used exclusive home videos of the Clintons, taken by Paul with the Clintons’ permission, became a viral internet phenomeneon that caused Google to change its ranking and reporting procedures to protect Hillary from the internet totally overwhelming her campaign. The story of the impact of seven years of publicizing and educating the voters through Paul v Clinton about the contempt for the voters and the Rule of Law displayed y Hillary Clinton in dealing with her top donor in her first election campaign has yet to be written- or even acknowledged- but the truth is out there on the internet if the interest is there to learn the most significant reason why the inevitability of Hillary Clinton’s juggernaut to regain the White House was derailed. Hillary Clinton Waves To Media After Four Hour Testimony before Whitewater Grand Jury- the First First Lady to be Called Before a Criminal Grand Jury Where the Special Prosecutor Stated “She gave factually inaccurate testimony” 
Friday ~ June 06, 2008 by Intermeddler Posted in "Ed Rendell", "hillary uncensored", Al Gore, Barack, Chelsea Clinton, DNC, Hillary, bill clinton, cbs, cheney, current affairs, democrats, election, entertainment, george bush, hillary clinton, hollywood, jim levin, marvel entertainment, obama, peter paul, politics, ron paul, scooter libby, stan lee, tony rezko, washington| 2 Comments
Is Hillary Helping To Hide Felon Fundraiser Friend Jim Levin From Bill Clinton Fraud Trial?
Paul v Clinton et al, the California civil fraud suit pending against Bill Clinton (and Grammys producer Gary Smith) brought by the Hollywood dot com millionaire who Bill enlisted as Hillary’s top 2000 donor and then defrauded and destroyed his public company, will be set for trial as soon as co-defendant and Clinton intimate Jim Levin is served a new Summons and complaint. (See You Tube that explains the story) Jim Levin was a key government witness against his former mentor and friend, Hillary Clinton national finance director David Rosen, in a criminal election law fraud trial in Los Angeles in May, 2005. Rosen was indicted by the Justice Department for hiding the $1.2 million plus cost of the Hillary fundraising Gala, paid for by Paul personally, from Hillary’s campaign, causing Hillary to file 3 false FEC reports. Levin was convicted in December of 2006 of various frauds on Chicago schools and was sentenced to probation because of his cooperation with the government as a witness in the Rosen trial and alleged other cooperation he is still engaging in. Levin has been evading service of the Summons in the Paul v Clinton case since 2004. Now that the California court ruled on February 21 that a trial date for Bill Clinton will be set as soon as Levin is served with his copy of the complaint, the race is on to find Levin. A member of Paul’s legal team attempted to enlist the aid of the US Probation Office in Chicago to assure that Levin could not obstruct justice while on probation by evading service of a lawful summons. It is the duty of every convicted felon on probation to faithfully comply with all laws and regulations. Since it is the duty of the Probation Office to monitor the actions of probationers to ensure they comply with the law- it is surprising when the Probation Office advises an officer of the Court that they will not intercede to require their probationer to desist from obstructing a court process by hiding his location. When it comes to those who the Clintons have a reason to protect for their own well being, they have a facility to turn the judicial system on its head. Rosen’s case was tried before a Clinton appointed Federal Judge Matz. Matz abused his ethical requirements for judicial impartiality when he began the trial by declaring to the jury and the media that Hillary had no involvement whatsoever in the illegal fundraising charges. ( A statement contradicted by a video tape of Hillary talking to underwriter Paul the day he began paying for the event). The judge also said that the government’s key witness, Peter Paul, was a con man. the judge knew that Rosen’s defense was going to be that he was conned by Paul who hid the price of the gala from him. Judge Matz’ prejudicial remarks to the jury about the key witness that the Defendant Rosen built his case on discrediting, the ensured the jury could not possibly convict Rosen beyond a reasonable doubt. This egregious violation of ethics by the Judge - knowingly throwing the trial- was never objected to by the DOJ Prosecutors (the same two who tried the Lewis Libby case), who joined with the Judge in opening remarks to the jury that made it clear Hillary had nothing whatever to do with the case. The trial became a Soviet style show trial with Levin paraded by the government as their star witness. The reality was that the same Chief of Public Integrity who masterminded the Rosen indictment and trial, Noel Hillman, also masterminded the “non” prosecution of National Security document thief and destroyer Sandy Berger. Hillman worked closely from 2002-2005 with Paul’s attorneys to completely understand the Clintons’ role in the felony solicitation and coordination of Paul’s $1.2 million plus contributions, and the hiding of that contribution from voters and the FEC. Yet he misrepresented their role in the affair to the jury in the Rosen case to exculpate the Clintons. Since Mr Hillman was promoted to the lifetime position of Federal Judge in New Jersey before Rep Tom Davis, Chairman of the Govt Reform Cmtee in the House accused him of obstructing the 9-11 Commission investigation, Hillman was never challenged on his actions in obstructing justice in both the Berger and Rosen prosecutions- all apparently designed to protect the Clintons.
Friday ~ March 03, 2008 by Intermeddler Posted in "Ed Rendell", "Norman Hsu", "hillary uncensored", Barack, Chelsea Clinton, DNC, Hillary, Rezko, bill clinton, bush, current affairs, david rosen, democrats, election, entertainment, hollywood, jim levin, obama, peter paul, politics, race, ron paul, stan lee, tony rezko, washington| 1 Comment
