Marvel Entertainment, Spider Man and the Wrath of Peter Paul
Marvel Faces Wrath of Peter Paul Barron’s feature story June 28, “The Rage Offstage At Marvel” written by its senior editor William “Wild Bill” Alpert, starts off saying, “THE COMIC BOOK’S SPLASH page would show a close-up of Peter F. Paul brooding about Marvel Entertainment , its creative force Stan Lee and the Clintons.” With that comic book flair, Barron’s reluctantly accepted the bona fides of the historic law suit filed by Stan Lee Media in 2007 against Marvel Entertainment for 50% of the copyright profits from Spider Man, The Incredible Hulk, Ironman and all of Stan Lee’s creations for Marvel. However, while Barron’s admitted that Marvel could well have a serious legal battle on its hands over title tp 50% of its most important copyrights, it also enhanced Marvel’s efforts to characterize the battle as one between Marvel and Peter Paul. Paul is referred to as “spearheading” what amounts to the biggest legal assault ever made on Marvel, or any other Entertainment behemoth regarding ownership of 50% of its principal assets. The fact is that Paul is a witness/whistleblower, not a director in charge of anything related to Stan lee Media- and every effort made to focus on Paul diminishes the focus on the multiple frauds in plain view that have been perpetrated on Stan Lee Media and Marvel shareholders, creditors and lenders. Barron’s followed its feature story with the sequel, Marvel Stock Drops After Barons Warning, taking credit for causing Marvel investors to suddenly become concerned enough about Stan Lee Media’s 2007 law suit that Marvel’s stock dropped in price. This second story also served to further attack the bona fides of the messenger/witness of Lee-Marvel misdeeds, Peter Paul, in a more aggressive way than Barron’s editor was comfortable with.Nothwithstanding all of the above, Barron’s online and magazine publications provided the first Wall Street validation of Stan Lee Media’s case against Marvel for ownership of Stan Lee’s co-creators rights to his Marvel characters. These rights were included in Lee’s October 15, 1998 comprehensive rights assignment to capitalize Stan Lee Media, where they remain today. These rights were were hidden by Lee when he placed SLM in Chapter 11 Debtor in Possession protection in Bankruptcy in 2001 and by Marvel when they failed to defend Lee’s 2002 suit to enforce Lee’s fraudulently induced contract with Marvel in November,1998. The article dramatizes the titanic struggle between Stan Lee Media and Marvel by focusing on Peter Paul’s efforts to expose the frauds he witnessed by various parties connected with Stan Lee Media, including Bill Clinton, short sellers, Stan Lee, Marvel Entertainment and Merrill Lynch, among others. Much was made of the fact that Paul is “spearheading” the litigation, which he is not, while he remains under house arrest on the SEC 10(b)5 violation he has pled guilty to in connection with the management of his margin accounts while under the supervision and control of Merrill Lynch. What is particularly interesting about Marvel’s conduct in defending against Stan Lee Media ’s complaint is that it is using the Clinton playbook’s defense Paul’s civil fraud suit against them, attacking the messenger, Peter Paul, and obfuscating the message of their frauds. Marvel’s public explanations of the case to the Barron’s editor that wrote the story, and in a letter to Barron’s in response to the story, continue to mislead the public and shareholders about the facts that are contained in the public record, and violate the same SEC Rule 10(b)5 Paul stands accused of. Stan Lee has in fact publicly claimed in sworn pleadings in federal court that he does have rights and claims to ownership of his co-creator’s rights in Marvel’s copyrights of his characters, yet Marvel has now publicly stated that he never made the very claims they paid him $10 million plus to settle! Their continuation of a pattern of public deceptions, omissions and intentional misstatements, detailed in Jim Nesfield’s SEC 13D filing in August 26, 2007, seems to be exempt from any regulatory scrutiny or accountability. Barron’s pointed out that while Stan Lee swore in his complaint against Marvel in 2002 that he made a conditional assignment of his rights to his world famous characters to Marvel in November, 1998 with the expectation he would participate in the profits derived from their exploitation of his characters, he and Marvel now say (after a sealed settlement of Lee’s suit was made by Marvel for more than $10 million) that Lee’s characters were work for hire in which he never had any rights! If that isnt a claim to his Marvel characters, its hard to imagine what is. See Paragraphs 13, 14 and 39 in the Complaint. The ongoing misrepresentations to Marvel shareholders and lenders by spokesmen and principals of Marvel, along with the numerous examples of misconduct by Lee and Marvel Chairman Perlmutter, detailed in Jim Nesfield’s 13D that has remained unchanged on the SEC’s web site since August, 2007, portend a very rocky road for the House of Ideas and those who have used villainous conduct to pillage shareholders and lenders. And for Peter Paul, charged with causing his company with Stan Lee to collapse leaving shareholders with nothing, there well could be a vindication of Paul’s efforts to save the company through his stock manipulations while it was being wrested away from him and shareholders by the Super Villains that Stan Lee brought to life.
Tuesday ~ July 07, 2008 by Intermeddler Posted in entertainment, hillary clinton, marvel entertainment, peter paul, politics, stan lee, stan lee media| No Comments
Hillary’s Oval Office Dreams “Truth Boated” By Paul v Clinton?
VICTORY! PAUL v CLINTON WINS 7 YEAR CAMPAIGN TO HOLD HILLARY CLINTON ACCOUNTABLE IN THE COURT OF PUBLIC OPINION!! Hillary Ends Presidential Campaign And Endorses Obama June 5, 2008 On June 12, 2001 Peter Paul filed a landmark civil fraud suit against Hillary and Bill Clinton and related parties, Paul v Clinton et al in Los Angeles Superior Court. The suit was filed by Peter Paul, the Hollywood entrepreneur that Bill Clinton enlisted to become Hillary’s largest 2000 donor. It was the cornerstone of an all out campaign entitled the Hillary Clinton Accountability Project to use every remedy available to a US citizen to expose the public corruption and obstructions of the rule of law directed by Hillary R Clinton with President Clinton and Democratic National Chairman Governor Ed Rendell. Paul v Clinton culminated in the release in January, 2008 of Hillary! Uncensored, the first ever documentary about Hillary Clinton which included exclusive home videos capturing Hillary Clinton engaged in felony violations of federal campaign laws. Hillary! Uncensored became an internet phenomenon when a 13 minute segment titled “The Shocking Video Hillary Doesnt Want You To See” was leaked over the internet on Google and You Tube resulting in more than 8.2 million views from October, 2007- May, 2008- coinciding with Hillary’s drop in the polls and loss to Obama. After personally witnessing, recording and documenting the misconduct and corruption of the Clintons, Paul embarked on a personal campaign to expose the frauds and illegalities directed by Hillary and Bill Clinton to win a Senate seat that would enable the Clinton Family to continue to abuse high public positions as Ex-President and US Senator to enrich themselves, advance their personal quests for power and ensure their ability to corrupt and manipulate any effort to hold them accountable for past, ongoing and future illegalities. Paul’s wealth had been destroyed by the Clintons and those acting on their behalf, and he relied exclusively on the support of tens of thousands of concerned Americans who believed in Paul’s personal quest and supported it with millions of dollars in donations to non profits acting on Paul’s behalf. Paul’s pending civil fraud suit, filed in June, 2001, and refiled in 2003 continues to be obstructed by abuses of legal principles and strategies that were perfected during the Clintons’ eight year tenure in the White House when they dealt with multiple Grand Juries and an Impeachment. But the case continues after the Supreme Court of California refused to dismiss it, and in spite of Court of Appeals actions intended to cripple it. Paul’s complaints to the Federal Election Commission resulted in an admission by Hillary Clinton’s Senate campaign that more than $700,000 of contributions from Paul were hidden and omitted from three false FEC reports resulting in the only fine imposed on Hillary Clinton’s campaign. Paul’s proffers to and cooperation with the Attorney General (Ashcroft) the Asst Atty General, Chertoff and the Chief of Public Integrity resulted in the indictment and trial of Hillary’s finance director David Rosen for 3 counts of causing false FEC reports to be filed that hid more than $800,000 in Paul’s contributions. The first ever documentary produced about Hillary’s political career that used exclusive home videos of the Clintons, taken by Paul with the Clintons’ permission, became a viral internet phenomeneon that caused Google to change its ranking and reporting procedures to protect Hillary from the internet totally overwhelming her campaign. The story of the impact of seven years of publicizing and educating the voters through Paul v Clinton about the contempt for the voters and the Rule of Law displayed y Hillary Clinton in dealing with her top donor in her first election campaign has yet to be written- or even acknowledged- but the truth is out there on the internet if the interest is there to learn the most significant reason why the inevitability of Hillary Clinton’s juggernaut to regain the White House was derailed. Hillary Clinton Waves To Media After Four Hour Testimony before Whitewater Grand Jury- the First First Lady to be Called Before a Criminal Grand Jury Where the Special Prosecutor Stated “She gave factually inaccurate testimony” 
Friday ~ June 06, 2008 by Intermeddler Posted in "Ed Rendell", "hillary uncensored", Al Gore, Barack, Chelsea Clinton, DNC, Hillary, bill clinton, cbs, cheney, current affairs, democrats, election, entertainment, george bush, hillary clinton, hollywood, jim levin, marvel entertainment, obama, peter paul, politics, ron paul, scooter libby, stan lee, tony rezko, washington| 2 Comments
